Ines Esteban, I think your approach is wrong. My parents, and I think all parents of all girls here, (please correct me if is not the case), would prefer largely that her daughter could lose her virginity willingly that for a rape.
As far as your own parents are concerned, I have no doubt about their feeling of sincere protection towards you.
On the other hand, for parents who allow themselves to exercise physical punishment or to place a padlock between the thighs of their own daughter to prevent her from spreading her legs, let me seriously doubt them.
It is obvious that their attachment to the sexual discipline of their daughter far outweighs what their daughter may feel in her heart. Otherwise why prevent him from masturbating if not to make prevail their conviction to the detriment of the feeling of their daughter.
In view of the different messages of this forum, it is clear that disobedience is severely repressed and that it is the source of all punishments possible and imaginable. And it is clear that if a girl were to be raped she would not have disobeyed "her little dad" ... Therefore it would necessarily be less serious for his pride. Sorry Ines but that's the sad truth.
The case of Sara's sister is a very good example.
She was severely punished for "touching" in the school washroom.
Assuming she was caught making love to a boy, she would have been fatally punished. We agree ?
But if she had been abused in the toilette by a boy who she could not push him away, would she have been punished by his father?
We can hope not? And why ?
Simply because the vainness parents would not have been reached so deeply.
And in relation to that you would come to what conclusion?
Just that being raped in the toilet of the college is less serious than touching in the toilet of the same college ?!
After this little demonstration are you really sure that I am wrong when I evoke a reality so disgusting for parents who claim to love their children?
If I gained absolute certainty by reading the various messages of this forum is that the pride and vanity of parents will always pass well before the happiness of their own daughter!
Otherwise why develop so many means and ploys as vicious as each other to prevent their daughter to touch herself ?!
I understand that it is deeply shocking to reach such a conclusion, but it is the sad reality.
If the parents sincerely loved their daughter, they would invest in protective equipment of the "AR Wear" type and not equipment to repress their sexuality.
Being parents does not mean having a title of property on your child like we one could have a title of property on a car. Being parents it's respected that your child can think differently of you.
Do girls have the right to think differently ? Of course not !