Laura Everybody here knows why, it was not a question basically. Just you have mentioned me in the previous post. But again, what's wrong with it?
Ines wrote :
There are adventures that a girl should not go alone! Pleasure can be a marvelous trip, but it has to be done holding the hand of our husband. Nothing wrong in await a little bit !
My reference to 28 years was to draw Ines' attention to the fact that the time spent in the belt could be cruelly long. Indeed as Ines and only 17 years old and you and Megan are 28 years old I was trying to warn her optimist when wrote "a little".
And personally I feel that beyond a certain age the wearing of the chastity belt becomes more and more indecent or even ridiculous. As much as I can understand that parents have been able to worry about the immaturity of some young girls (between 13 and 18 years) as far as I find aberrant to contain a girl who (major) in the belt and who has the right to vote for decide on the future of the country.
Here is my example:
In our country (France) @Vanessa would have been legally aged to access the post of President of the Republic. And if she were elected to this post without being married, I would have great difficulty to conceive that these parents could impose the wearing of the chastity belt by going for example the unlocked at the Elysee Palace to take a shower under monitoring.
I do not know if my example speaks to you but the more I think about it and the more I find that there is really something ridiculous about forcing a person of age (over 18) to wear a chastity belt.
Because women in our western societies now have the same rights as men, I will never be able to admit that once women are 18 older, they can not have the right to have sex when they desire.
