Max9 Evolution and creationism a re litterly the same theory, just from different point of views.
If you meant to say "Evolution and creationism are literally the same thing", and you believe that is the case, then we are so far apart where words mean different things that it's simply not worth discussing. A female human evolving over countless generations from female apes is entirely different from what amounts to manufacture of "Eve"from a male (Adam) human's rib.
Max9 Not belorving in god is actually a belirv
Atheism actually it isn't a belief. It means no belief in God(s) by definition. A belief is not the same as no belief. It means I can form a belief whenever I want, including in your God assuming you convince me without any hang-ups of losing other beliefs. I am open minded. A religious belief specifically precludes open mindedness.
Max9 re we brainwashed by religion or by the tendency to only believe in testable and explainable this to exist... for exmaple the unexplained black holes...
You try to say that scientists/astronomers etc. belief in black holes is a belief in the same way religious people believe in their God(s). This is only a confounder that has no merit. It is easy to say scientists believe in blackholes as a short cut, but contextually it is different. I am a physician, not a physicist which means I am really not qualified to talk about black holes. But from my reading I know that black holes were a theoretical prediction of General Relativity, long before any candidates were actually observed. The theoretical model for black holes actually makes quite a few predictions, many of which have been observed in candidate black holes both in our galaxy and also distant galaxies in the far reaches of the universe. I know of no scientists that agrees that all the theoretical predictions of black holes have been observed. Indeed so far as I am aware, the theories predict that there is no way to ascertain what goes on inside the even horizon of black holes, a prediction that obviously we do not have the technology to confirm or deny.
Straying further into a realm I know even less about, I am aware that in the end, General Relativity isn't the final answer since it cannot be reconciled fully with that other theory of physics which also makes impressive predictions that are confirmed: that of quantum theory. And it turns out that these two pinnacles of mankind's theoretical thinking collide drastically on the inside of blackholes producing meaningless results which in any case we cannot measure. Thus belief in blackholes is nothing like belief in a supernatural. It is merely acceptance of theories that make successful predictions. When observations fall outside these predictions, the theories get overturned.
So please stop using your words incorrectly in a vain attempt to demonstrate that religion is just another science. Religion is little else but beliefs. Scientist in general don't hold any beliefs in the sense that you mean (even though I admit belief is a shorthand word to mean acceptance of theories).
On the other hand if you wish to "believe" in your supernatural God(s) I do not mind, up until you when you attempt to poison minds of children who possess a clean slate on which they can write their own research. Then I al ready to write essays to defend them.
