Regarind OP: Wasn't there a belt with a similar look to what you described made in the mid 90s? I forgot what it was called but they only made like 10-50 of them or something, I forgot what its called but there's like 5 pictures of it on the internet and searching it up only ends up with mass produced chinese crap, so it's hard to find.
I honestly didn't like the look of some parts of the belt (it more or less looked like someone got playdough and smashed a belt together with it) but apparently it's moulded hardened plastic or something, which is something you don't find today.
But yeah I agree that the material of the belt doesn't matter so much once you've achieved the desired purposes with minimal compromise.
Sin Stainless steel is inert - it doesn't react with other substances, which is why it works so well for piercing and surgical instruments (and chastity belts)
Actually not 100% true, very few people will still react with some types of stainless steels, even the surgical 420 and 440 series. The reason why stainless steels are considered "stainless" in the first place is because like aluminium, they generate a tough, water resistant protective oxide layer that is (usually) adequate for their use purpose. 420 and 440 stainless steels are generally difficult and expensive to work with which is why manufacturers typically use 316 and 304 series.
audioguy58 I had also wanted to assemble a “dream team” of medical doctors:
Look into jura's cocoon ace. He's made a cast model for the front piece of his belt which works extremely well. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for other areas, and the front piece cannot be adjusted on the fly, so customisation for customer's requests are limited to prefab casts and they're made from 304 steel while the rest of the belt is made from 316, but you can choose to coat them. I had both my front and rear crotch pieces coated in teflon but unfortunately it didn't work as well as I'd anticipated as a reduced sticky coating.
nothing beats quoting yourself 😉