Chastity for unwed sons

Edward

Two more years of study then my degree is finished.

Angelina

Edward

and you are not allowed to date until then?

Vanessa

Edward

Sorry for you!

Angelina that's right, i also think that a good relationship between siblings is more important 🙂

Sure.

Angelina otherwise it can be dangerous

As you know,I think no matter the device,making a man wearing it permanently can be dangerous.But we've already discussed it!😉

Edward They won't allow dating until school is done.

Very hard rule!

Angelina

Vanessa As you know,I think no matter the device,making a man wearing it permanently can be dangerous.But we've already discussed it!😉

I know and you know that I think differently 😉

but too small a cage is definitely dangerous

Vanessa

Angelina you know that I think differently 😉

Yes.😉

Angelina oo small a cage is definitely dangerous

We agree about it!

Tobbe

Circumcised and pierced glans I think the only way to get males in a cage 24/7/365.
Then it will not be any problems with swollen foreskin or a way to get penis out from the cage, when it is locked.

Max9

Well, many cadged boys also don't have a foreskin anymore. It makes it way easier to keep the scepter clean. But also it might happen that you don't feel anymore that much down there. Yes, it definitely is a problem when you can pull the scepter out of the cadge in a flaccid state, but it doesn't work with any cadge. The ones that are more open can't be escaped from that easily, because you can't get back in anymore. And if you wear the Vice, for example, you can't even pull it out. Yes, there are also some cadges with spikes you also can't get out of, like the iron virgin, but that's nothing else than brutal torture. And you can also belt a boy, of course

Tobbe

Max9 I don't think you shall say "The Vice is good!
This from https://www.amazon.com/The-Vice-Clear/product-reviews/B0171AEHFK
Andrew Beach
3.0 out of 5 stars Good cage, but doesn't actually prevent pullout.
Reviewed in the United States on December 29, 2017
The cage itself is fairly good and a big step above my previous cage but the anti-pullout ring didn't actually keep me from pulling out even with the smallest option available. To make things worse I didn't even have to try to pull out on the second smallest I just popped out after two days in the middle of the night. The final nail, however, is with all three options I couldn't wear the device for more than three consecutive days due to the anti-pullout causing me to bleed due to continuous friction. Luckily there is an option to wear without the anti-pullout so the cage is still useable. Overall I wouldn't buy this product again given the chance.

Erik

I think this is a similar issue as the Turpin family recently. It is an affliction by others. But also the thing is errors about erotisism in general.

Basically it is also embarrassing commonly speaking. (The person that undergoes it excused in a way)

BikelockFugitive

For such a cage to work properly, it would need to allow full erection.
The male penis (especially during puberty) needs to get erect quite often, which is well... why it does that for no reason whatsoever. For adults it mostcertainly cannot be healthy either, but I assume the damaging effects will be far less severe,

Johnathan

BikelockFugitive
Max9
The only way for a cage to allow full erections while still allowing for proper urination is through the use of a catheter. Catheters are far to problematic for 24/7 usage.

Erik what do you mean by "financial intimidation"?

Max9

Yes, the perfect cadge for males would allow the thing to get erected and not to be held down by that. But I've honestly never found something like this.
If you have one you can't get erected in you should only wear it permanently for some weeks and then take if off to have some time being hard. It's important for the tissue to be able to get erections. Because that way the body can build new hemals and the tissue stays soft and flexible.
Edit: And still allow it to stay clean when going to toilet

Erik

Basically this is how is worded what the problem is.

Not immediately ,,private parts''. Only if time and peace is taken in a somewhat trustworthy atmosphere.
,,bodily harm'', can not explain immediately what it is, as it is very insulting and painful
There is financial intimidation

And how to actually not become the victim of a type of financial intimidation. I say financial here, but there are other things too. But I could not start about it. It does not necessarily have to be self.

Angelina

Johnathan what do you mean by "financial intimidation"?

probably financial dependency which is also a reason for many girls here

Erik

Johnathan
Angelina
At least Edward said it is a condition for his future.
I didn't see anyone else say it. (...)

It's something of lately that it came up. I don't mean to start drilling for principles of old. That proved to fail and needed review. Now there is an issue with them.
But somehow it draws other people when something like that happens. As this thread and this forum is about.

I don't mean anyone should go.
But in the male section, it is different as in the female section.
I wouldn't have said what I did there.

Max9

Johnathan Yes, that's right. So if a cadge would ba able to allow full erection and still fit properly and also e able to be worn 24/7 the cadge would have to be a belt of some sort. The only problem is how to clean the tube. But yu could use an open tube that is made out of steel strings.

Erik

The whole thing is so very much embarrassing.

But anyway. Anyone here that got one of those things that would want to try to get rid of it?

Of course it would have to be something.
Maybe there is a point to be made. Those devices are especially known to be used by trans trap cross-dress gender dysphoria. That those devices do not answer to the goal they are used for. And they don't. Not in any case.

Johnathan

Erik I would say from experience that these devices, if equipped properly, can achieve their objective. Although chastity cages are also used by fetish communities, this does not negate the fact that they can be used for non fetish purposes (such as masturbation prevention) as well.
While it is true that placing your child in chastity can be considered abuse, few people would ever notice that I am wearing the cage, thus the legal risk is low. Even if they did notice and report to the authorities, I could just claim I am wearing it willingly. Not sure what you mean by "sexual divergences".

Erik

Juridically speaking forcing people to truncate a bodypart -damage, is as bad as child abuse.

What I meant by errors in erotisism is amongst other things that what is generally speaking called sexually abusing a minor is not in all cases what it is as a fact.
And even all the sexual divergences are really untrue. It all works about the same in everyone. Proof does exist for this.

Erik

Johnathan

Even if they did notice and report to the authorities, I could just claim I am wearing it willingly.

I'm not that surprised that you would say this. Because the whole issue of erotisism IS filled with problems that are unnecessary.

Maybe to name another thing. The Bible. It does not forbid anything on itself.
MT 37-40
“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

First it would have to be against someone's will and well being. This also becomes clear from other texts in the Bible.
But God. God is spirit. To say something about that, it would be longer to say it.

Personally I do not diverge or be affiliated with crime. Still what all the sexual/partner divergences do, it works about the same in everyone. This would mean that the existing preferences like bisexual or homo or lesbian really do not exist.

But also its function is unknown. Basically what can be seen is that it is a clear way of creating family. (In the common sense of friends. Still different).

But would you claim that you are wearing it willingly if there is danger of persecution?

Angelina

Erik But would you claim that you are wearing it willingly if there is danger of persecution?

anyone who still loves his parents despite the belt would say so 😉

Johnathan

Erik Not sure what your point is behind all these posts. My parents have put me in chastity, and I will respect their wishes for me to remain chaste until I am released. This is the best option for everyone involved, so it is the route I will be taking regardless of what anyone says.
On the topic of religion, I am pretty sure self-pleasure is a sin, but I will have to verify that later.

Angelina +1 😉

« Previous Page Next Page »