George Although the reaction is a little bit more understandable

This is what happens when you want to be considered a worldwide leader in respecting human rights, and then you have to break your own treaty obligations in order to ensure the security of the state.

  • Ines replied to this.

      What does this all have to do with court-ordered chastity belts though? Are you saying we should lock a belt on every person of reproductive age entering the country without a visa until their asylum request is granted?

        Andrew

        I am not very smart but for me, the most important task of a state is guarantee the safety of the citizens, the most important thing.
        Every order issue can be done better or worse for private sector, but not safety.

          youdontknowme What does this all have to do with court-ordered chastity belts though?

          Nothing. This is off-topic.

            youdontknowme

            i don't think anyone (or rather most people) want to do that, but that would certainly be an interesting topic for discussion here on the forum as well.