Avery I expected to find discussion about how to win the struggle to be chaste by people who wanted to be chaste, not by people who were forced to be chaste or were forcing others to be (e.g. their minor children).
I'm also reacting here on Avery's post in the Introductions topic: "...Thus my contention that this board is miss named. It's not about unwed chastity it's about forced chastity. I do realize there are some exceptions. ...", because I think it is not really a subject for that topic.
Yes, I agree that the title 'unwedchastity' does not totally cover all that is discussed here on this forum, especially since a number of wearers are wed. That name was thought of some 2,5 years ago by a small group, and they were looking for a name that had as little association with fetish/bondage sites as possible, but still was somewhat descriptive. By now this forum has developed into a place for all serious use of chastity devices.
You do see a lot of posts about young people being forced / coerced / convinced into chastity devices, but to me that is also the group who needs most help / sympathy / place to vent. People who are willing wearers, with their partner as the keyholder, might want some practical tips, and some do need to vent their frustration (but don't want sympathy), but for many of those, there is not that much urgency to post a lot, except when they want to help others.
Since you brought this up several times, I wonder what your intention is: do you just want to vent, or do you feel that the name (and thus website address) of this forum should change, or that we just shouldn't talk as much about those being forced?
Of course the forced minors are also unwed, so for those the name isn't exactly false, although perhaps not as descriptive as it could have been. Could it be that you wanted a site that is more about what you are interested in, and that made you interpret the forum name in a certain way, which led to an expectation that then led to some disappointment?
