Locked whilst feeling unwell

Yes.

Philip if you need quick and sudden access to a toilet then yes!

Philip

i think that's ok. i had the situation once, the belt wasn't gone, but it was only very loosely fastened. however, my father then monitored me more than usual as "compensation".

Philip If you have some concern about the security look out for a solution for this time. Also remember that if the person is ill and not feeling well, then they are not as likely and think of taking advantage of the situation.

If the chastity device gets in the way of your health, your health should always come first. A reasonable path is to talk to your keyholder if you have one, so you both can look at your situation and see what needs to be done to take care of your health, and, if necessary, by what alternative means your chastity can be protected. Without a key holder, you will need to make that decision yourself.

For a girl who mainly wears the belt to abstain from sex with a partner for example, a reasonable concession would be no going out or receiving visitors while the belt is off - a good idea to stay alone in bet while sick anyway and nobody can take her virginity like that. If masturbation is a concern, open door and random checkups.

youdontknowme a reasonable concession would be no going out or receiving visitors while the belt is off - a good idea to stay alone in bet while sick anyway and nobody can take her virginity like that

My case

You shouldn't wear your belt, if your health conditions don't allow it.

Philip I am locked when I am sick. It normally makes no difference, except maybe more cleaning breaks, depending on what I have.

youdontknowme If the chastity device gets in the way of your health, your health should always come first

Definitely. But health can easily be confused with comfort. Everything needed to be clean and hygienic at all times. As long as this is given, I see no reason why it's necessary to get out of the belt.

Being without the belt while being supervised is of course okay, too when you are sick.

Sara2001 Definitely. But health can easily be confused with comfort. Everything needed to be clean and hygienic at all times. As long as this is given, I see no reason why it's necessary to get out of the belt.

Being without the belt while being supervised is of course okay, too when you are sick.

That is why I suggested an open discussion with your keyholder, or a self-assessment of the situation of the situation if there is none. Something like gastrointestinal issues might call for frequent or even continuous belt removal, if you constantly need to run to the toilet at moment's notice and the rear opening of the belt makes clean toilet use difficult. And unlocking and cleaning up after the fact can be an unpleasant experience, so whether that is a valid option depends on how dediated to the cause of maximum chastity the two parties are.

Comfort can be a valid factor in diseasr recovery, so even if we knew the details of your illness, the decision how much of an exception is made from your regular chastity rules is a very personal one that can only be made by the people in your chastity arrangement unless the belt directly gets in the way of your health, in which case off with it.

youdontknowme Something like gastrointestinal issues might call for frequent or even continuous belt removal, if you constantly need to run to the toilet at moment's notice and the rear opening of the belt makes clean toilet use difficult.

I know these situations from my own experience. They are definitely not comfortable, but a shower/unbelted cleaning afterwards solves the problem from a health related point of view as well as not being belted. It's just more work for the keyholder.

Even a belted shower can solve the issue, but I think an unbelted shower is more appropriate.

youdontknowme And unlocking and cleaning up after the fact can be an unpleasant experience

Do we talk about what is NECESSARY or about what is pleasant? Of course it's unpleasant and an opening before toilet should be the norm. But it's not necessary to stay hygienic.

youdontknowme Comfort can be a valid factor in diseasr recovery

I agree, but if wearing a chastity belt is so uncomfortable for you that it impacts your recovery, you shouldn't wear this chastity belt at all not only when you are sick.

youdontknowme unless the belt directly gets in the way of your health, in which case off with it.

Of course, if I break my hips or something like that, I can't wear the belt or if the reason for being sick is located in the area where the belt usually is, the belt needs to get off without questioning. But these situations are rare.

Sara2001 Do we talk about what is NECESSARY or about what is pleasant? Of course it's unpleasant and an opening before toilet should be the norm. But it's not necessary to stay hygienic.

24/7 chastity is not strictly necessary either. When the situation makes the arrangement more unpleasant than what you agreed to, it is a good idea to have an honest conversation with your keyholder

youdontknowme 24/7 chastity is not strictly necessary either. When the situation makes the arrangement more unpleasant than what you agreed to, it is a good idea to have an honest conversation with your keyholder

Chastity belts in general are not necessary. Every couple has it's own goals. I never said it shouldn't be pleasant when this is how it should be for a couple.

The question was what is necessary. Or with other words, what would be the minimum freedom that is needed. The question was not: "What would be the best comprim between security and a pleasant situation".

I for example can accept that I have to wear the belt when I am ill, others can see it differently. For me it would feel like he doesn't care for me when it becomes complicated, so he chooses the easiest way for him and just let me out, risking that I do things I am not allowed to do. Why should I invest so much effort and why should I give up such an important thing, just to make him happy, when he is not willing to take care of this gift when it's a bit more complicated to take care of it. I wouldn't feel valued and honoured but used and cheated. It wouldn't help me to get my health back quicker but that's just my opinion.

youdontknowme Something like gastrointestinal issues might call for frequent or even continuous belt removal, if you constantly need to run to the toilet at moment's notice and the rear opening of the belt makes clean toilet use difficult.

at this point, i would only see a safe solution that is still good for health. it may sound disgusting, but then the key holder has to go to the toilet with you, remove the belt and then wait until the wearer is done.

Sara2001 Or with other words, what would be the minimum freedom that is needed.

so my father and i would do it like this: the belt would only be put on very loosely, so i could probably at least masturbate, but it would still be difficult. i would be controlled much more during this time and my room door would be removed. In addition, the punishments for attempted cheating would be increased.

Sara2001 The question was what is necessary. Or with other words, what would be the minimum freedom that is needed. The question was not: "What would be the best comprim between security and a pleasant situation".

You made this into a question of necessity. The original question was whether unlocking was OK, and that depends on what both parties feel is the best course of action. Obviously if both parties would prefer maximum security and can find a way to take care of a person's health needs without taking a break from enforced chastity, that is a valid course of action. But if the wearer feels that the present agreement is not doing her well-being any favors, this is absolutely something that she should have an opportunity to discuss with her keyholder. That is all I am saying.

youdontknowme But if the wearer feels that the present agreement is not doing her well-being any favors, this is absolutely something that she should have an opportunity to discuss with her keyholder.

Definitely. If both are fine with this and this is how their agreement is working, that's a perfect solution. I think it depends on what they want, but that's always the case, not only when you are sick. I am happy for anyone who is happy with this solution and can understand your point of view. I just wanted to say that there is not necessarily an automatism for everyone in such a situation.

In the case of a gastro problem I can't see why anyone would have a problem with unlocking. If you're lying there feeling miserable with your stomach churning I doubt you are really thinking of either leaping into bed with a random man or masturbating