Sanity I wasn't aware that there was an ongoing discussion about how the forum should be moderated regarding chastity belt usage on minors;
It is not my place to judge the moderation here, but if I may offer my opinion:
I do believe it is morally justifiable to make a chastity arrangement with a dependent who is beyond the age of consent, but under the age of majority, provided that care is taken to avoid any form of coercion, even implicit: There must be consent on both sides, there must be a way out if either side is not happy with the arrangement, the device must not interfere in everyday life (beyond the obvious) and it must not suppress personal development. Unfortunately, in a guardian-dependent relationship, free consent is difficult to verify, so I also have respect for the fact that in many jurisdictions, not everything that is theoetically justifiable is also allowed.
Furthermore, I do believe that non-consensual use has a place here, as this is partially a support group to those who find themselves in such a situation (even though I believe that many of those "experiences" are actually fantasies). I am quite happy that this community has members who inform the people who are subject to sch non-consensual arrangements of their rights and their recouse should they be willing to do what it takes to get out of such an arrangement. What I cannot stand for is promoting non-consensual arrangements, i.e. portraying it as a good idea to lock up children or unwilling adolescents.
