Telling best friend?

Kaja

curious I agree. Or there are now erotic stories with under ages heros, it doesnt hurt anybody and it can help somebody. So why is it illegal?

curious

Kaja
AFAIK it is currently not clear if it is actually illegal.
As AI generated images do not show real people, it really depends on how the law is interpreted. Until now this has never been an issue. In other words: Cases that evolve around AI generated images that would be illegal if real will in most countries make their way through the legal system and only the respective highest courts in each country define the new meaning of the existing laws in relation to AI generated images. Unless politicians make new laws that take into account AI images are quicker.

Sasha

curious If I remember correctly, any depiction of a minor, real or animated is illegal in Canada, and I’d imagine similar laws exist in other countries as well.
Could certainly fuel an entire debate over whether a depiction of a fictional character is or isn’t illegal, can see both sides honestly

Kaja

Sasha That it what I mean.

youdontknowme

Sasha Could certainly fuel an entire debate over whether a depiction of a fictional character is or isn’t illegal, can see both sides honestly

Definitely a complex question where people are very prone to knee-jerk responses that are too one-sided to really reflect the complexity. But I am not sure if a forum that is trying to defend itself against people using it to share their CSA fantasies is the right venue to have that debate.

Milord

youdontknowme
What is CSA?

youdontknowme

Milord Child sexual abuse

Milord

youdontknowme
You are definitively right.

WriterAlexis

youdontknowme

I used to be heavily involved in 4-H. The local cropshare was referred to as Community Supported Agriculture.

That was better than this.

youdontknowme

WriterAlexis Some people are also in favor of the Confederate States of America. In the interest of peace, I will avoid placing those on a value scale.

Angelina

youdontknowme Ines's objective is to change that reputation and create a place to talk about practicalities of real long-term chastity belt use, the diverse uses of chastity belts outside of BDSM relationships and more

and I share this goal, but I think that the current politics in the forum will lead to the opposite. Unfortunately I can't answer your other arguments because I don't know what CSA means?

Tabletop

I would like to help you and want you to feel welcome, unfortunately my hands are tied, I can't do it without violating the rules of the forum

curious But what if AI can provide for the demand without children being affected?

This is actually completely unnecessary, fantasy arises in the head and no matter what we do, we will not be able to control other people's thoughts. Otherwise I agree with you

Ines Usually never was possible.

Of course it was, that's the reason why I joined this forum back then so that I could talk about my problems without sexualization. This community helped me a lot back then and I hope it helps other people too. And Ines, I like you, I appreciate your work and believe that you are fighting for the right goals. The fact is that the community is unfortunately no longer open to some discussions that would be important. I don't want to attack you, I want to give you and all other users something to think about so that everyone can feel welcome again. If we no longer allow this, exactly the opposite of what we want will happen, then we will become another SM community

Milord

Angelina Of course it was, that's the reason why I joined this forum back then so that I could talk about my problems without sexualization

I disagree. Something that prevent sex is sexual in nature. It's like asking to speak of atheism pretending to avoid religion. Chastity belts are meant to prevent sexual acts. Of course is sex. see masturbation topic. In no other sexual forum there is so talking about masturbation than this.
If chastity belt was meant as a medical device, than you can ask for neutrality, but an item whose purpose is to prevent the wearer from doing sex is definitely sexual, and minors should stay away.

youdontknowme

Angelina Unfortunately I can't answer your other arguments because I don't know what CSA means?

Already explained it above.

Angelina unfortunately my hands are tied

I was about to make a joke out of that, but between your past experiences and the fact that minors are actively present in this thread, better not.

Milord your case is unique, and hardly can be a lawful base to create a policy

Maybe we really need Prudence's chastity court. Wonder if Sasha would be interested in submitting her case, or if that fake court is too silly for someone who has spent a lot of time in real court for reasons that also involve her belt.

Sasha

Milord Can also argue that preventing what I was engaged in in this way, while unconventional would have been in my best interest.
Not saying it’s right, but there’s always multiple interpretations

WriterAlexis

Milord

Something that prevent sex is sexual in nature.

Is crippling social awkwardness sexual?

That's hot.

Angelina

Milord

i don't want to be misunderstood, of course a chastity belt is a sexual device, the belt is sexual. i mean that the wearer of the belt is not sexualised, that was something that worked better in the past

youdontknowme I was about to make a joke out of that, but between your past experiences and the fact that minors are actively present in this thread, better not.

it was just a saying. short explanation for everyone, i can't help without breaking the rules of the forum (that frustrates me)

Milord Just let's avoid thinking that the whole chastity belting is not about sexuality.

of course this forum is also primarily about sexuality, but you can discuss things like a sexual fantasy or you can discuss what is factual

Milord

Sasha
I'm sorry but I can't understand how your words are tied to chastity belt and sexualization. Can you help me?

Sasha

Milord Yes it would be tied to my sexuality, what I’m saying is that if I’d be pushed in that direction it could be seen as positive.
Again, just playing devils advocate it’s never ok to force it

Milord

Sasha
I like to be challenged. Still you have to admit that your case is unique, and hardly can be a lawful base to create a policy. It's too personal.

youdontknowme

WriterAlexis Your face is so ugly, it is sexual in nature.

Milord

WriterAlexis
In pretty sure you understand my point.

youdontknowme
Don't rub it in!

WriterAlexis

youdontknowme

#jealous

Just wait until my glow up.

youdontknowme

Milord I would say when another person controls whether you can have sex, there is a sexual component in that. Not sure that is a dealbreaker for platonic and familial keyholding, but it is a complication those dynamics have to handle.

« Previous Page Next Page »