Milord makes the idea of continuous wearing impossible and for long time utterly dangerous

Like @Angelina, my counter argument is that I have worn a belt continuously for years and am also still alive and, I think, doing well.
Continuously has meant different things over the years but right now means 24/7 except removal about once a week for cleaning and "me time". I did not start 24/7 but worked up to that over time. The build up allowed for adjusting and modifying to prevent pinching and to build a tolerance for chafing. I have, so far, never had an issue with panic attacks. There are times when I would like to be out of the belt so as not to be subject to its restrictions but the agreement with the person holding my keys deals with that and with being out when I want. Being able to easily be out of the belt whenever I want, defeats the purpose (for me).
Some disclaimers: I see and accept the advantages, for me, in wearing a belt. I consented to wearing and to it being very, very difficult for me to stop wearing. I am a man so I am not subject to monthly issues of body size and shape change. I do have to watch what I eat to not change shape due to that. That restriction is a benefit of wearing.

      Tjc

      A bit difficult to read. Anyway @Tjc you are male, and this makes all the difference of the world: male and female genitalia are completely different, and have different needs and maintenances.

      So, while I believe you and your experience, I don’t consider your experience a valid counter argument. I know more than a man in such a situation, but no woman

      • Tjc replied to this.
      • Ines likes this.

          Milord A bit difficult to read

          How can I improve this to make it less difficult?

              Milord This is not a valid counter argument for me.

              the fact that i exist is not a counterargument to your thesis that it is impossible to wear the belt almost permanently for many years (except for cleaning)? you can claim i'm a fake now, but if you don't, your argument makes no sense

                  Angelina I don't want to be rude, but if I have to choose between believing my wife and what I see with my own eyes and believing someone who is doing something I believe is impossible, then you have to provide some proof. If not physical, at least logical. A cable belt is very snug against the body, but it's flexible, and still, my wife is unable to stay in for more than 12 hours continuously. I should believe, based only on your word, that you wear a rigid one with accessories like tight bands and chastity for much more time. No, it's impossible.

                      Milord

                      then don't believe me, but believe the many other girls/women who describe similar things. and you have to remember one thing, without the keys you have no other choice

                          Angelina

                          As there girls here that believe that continual belting is impossible. And if no one explain me how you can do I will not believe.

                          Angelina and you have to remember one thing, without the keys you have no other choice

                          When unbelt for clean you just refuse to get back in the belt. So what?

                                Milord Respectfully, you are using a sample of one (you and your wife) to draw a conclusion that you apply to whether or not something is possible. Given that there are multiple counter examples, your conclusion may not be justified. Perhaps it is better for us to know that for your wife, because of the reason you list above, 24/7 wear is not possible. Your wife's experience does not necessarily apply to everyone else.

                                    Milord I am going to propose a hypothesis. I don't have the means to test it but it fits the available anecdotes.

                                    Perhaps those who insist that a custom-fitted ridged belt is more comfortable than a cable belt are correct and long-term wairing is more possible with that design.

                                        pestulens
                                        @Tjc

                                        I will try to answer you both
                                        1) my wife has an impressive resistance to pain. Beside this, if she resisted for 6 hours and other said that they can resist in for 12, 18… ok it’s personal. But here it’s 10 hours against 3 years. Now, I don’t know how much experience you have whith a female belt, but the area near the crotch, where every belt end, has the skin that is very thin. Tissues can chafe the skin. Can you imagine metal? Because the body change shape. And the belt is metal, doesn’t change.

                                        2) Once chafing start, it will get worse and worse. The skin will redden and will start bleeding in the long run unless you remove

                                        3) Skin need to breath, and metal is not something that allow for breathing. Especially in the most delicate part of a woman. This alone will cause irritation.

                                        4) It needs a lot of breaks for cleaning

                                        5) Even the best fitted belt, and I fitted and changed the belt several time to adjust to my wife body, is still rigid.

                                        And I never even started to talk about accessories 24 7.

                                        Anyway, I’m ready to rethink my position, but not based on “because I say so”. I have all the rights to not consider this valid.

                                        Edit

                                        Tjc Given that there are multiple counter examples, your conclusion may not be justified

                                        Who?

                                        pestulens Perhaps those who insist that a custom-fitted ridged belt is more comfortable than a cable belt are correct and long-term wairing is more possible with that design.

                                        And what about social opportunities, going to a Beauty salon? Sport? Pool? Beach? A marriage? Travel?

                                                Milord I’m only responding once to this, you have several women myself included who wear continuously with few breaks. We do it and live with it.
                                                We spent many months perfecting a custom fitted belt and adapting to it, we did not just dive in head first.
                                                So if it’s not something your wife can manage that’s fine and I suspect she wouldn’t be the only woman who can’t. But that doesn’t mean that others can do it

                                                    Sasha Sasha, here

                                                    Sasha For me I’m actually in the belt and accessories about 19-20 hours of the day. Cleaning, letting my skin breathe, exercising, etc.

                                                    you said that you manage for 19-20 hours a day. This is more than my wife manage to do, but it’s not 24 hours per day. For me 20 over 24 is realistic. I know it can be done.

                                                    It’s the always locked on except for few minutes cleaning I feel it’s not realistic. But it’s not set into stone. I may think it is possible if someone can provide reasons. This is how it works for me. I give several reasons why I think it cannot be done. Feel free, if you want, to address my concerns.

                                                        I see the difference between a cable belt and a belt wich has a continue crotch part. It Starts at the Front of the waist belt and end in the Back of the waist belt. AS far as I know it IS Mad Out of one piece sheet metal. This minimise skin Irritationen.

                                                          Joh
                                                          In the back maybe it will minimize, but the lateral parts (the ones that are on the left and on the right of the front shield) are still rigid and in contact with delicate skin.

                                                          • Joh replied to this.