Bryan My impression has always been that she viewed what her parents are doing as wrong, but that she has made the tactical decision not to fight them on it because she believes the consequences of doing so would be worse for her than complying. Especially since she thinks she will be in a stronger negotiating position in the future.
Belted by parents #2
- Edited
In one poll you write you are belted by your parents and in this poll you vote it is never acceptable to be belted by ones parents?
Yep.
Bryan My impression was that @WriterAlexis was an adult who was choosing to remain in her belt for various benefits, something more akin to answer 3 (or 4)
in my opinion, she tolerates the belt so as not to unnecessarily burden the family peace, but she does not wear the belt voluntarily and considers it unacceptable to do it to other children
Owl I will not change my mind. Exactly as nothing can happens and convince me that whipping, closing in basement, genitals inspection to check for hymen integrity, and similar abuses are right.
In extreme situations, but really extreme, I can accept it. I can't remember where I read of a girl in psychic ward used to masturbate so much that she actually self mutilate her genitals, and have to be restrained. In case like this I think that a belt, under medical surveillance, can be an acceptable solution.
- Edited
General remark: We face the situation again, that the word "children" in English (as in some other similar languages, AFAIK) is unfortunately ambiguous. It conflates the attribute of being someone's offspring with the attribute of being young.
It makes however a difference in my evaluation, if we face a situation of a grown woman and her mother, e.g. Renita's, or an adolescent.
This just as to better reflect my own considerations in this or similar threads. Will think about the rest later again.
Owl What makes it worse is that some people use machine translators that map "children", intended as the word for "offspring", to the word for "pre-teens". Often in strongly-gendered languages as well where "child" as a gender-neutral equivalent to "son"/"daughter" does not exist.
Owl @youdontknowme
maybe we should stick on "adult child" so to remove any ambiguity.
Milord Good idea where it is relevant.
- Edited
Jeez, that's even worse. Adolescence is one thing (and difficult a topic enough), but if a generator made some pre-teen sh*t of it ... :-(
(For the records: My personal age of consent for chastity would be the same as for sexual relations. I categorically reject anything earlier. Even above every individual case needs to be considered very well if pre full legal age. Actually, every case should be considered well :-), but the more mature the person, the more I assume the persons is actually able and accountable. And being able to account for bad decisions or being responsible to end a situation, as well.)
Owl It makes however a difference in my evaluation, if we face a situation of a grown woman and her mother, e.g. Renita's, or an adolescent.
it makes a big difference, but when i talk about children, i always talk about children of their parents. for children under 18 i would say for clarification that we then talk about underage/minor children.
of course there can always be confusion, so we should try to be clear about what we mean and clarify if there are problems of understanding
8 days later
Milord you should present in “introduction”
