Marder well we have both been raised to respect our elders and have faith in they know what they are doing. Yeah I imagine she could have refused but she didn't, not sure her reasons at that age. Yes you are right there are many options out there but that was the idea they put forward as her mother (my aunt) was already wearing one at that time also so you are correct preventing masturbation was also a key focus I believe

I could have refused also but I have adhd and I like rules and regulations and boundaries set for me so the belt works well in that respect.

The cable belts are wire rope so quite adjustable., undo the screw and adjust the cable and then retighten We did have to cut the silicone tubing a bit as I am smaller that she was.

the one I have now is alot let adjustable bit still some leway

She has a mysteel and yes she managed to ride, Nothing strenuous, was more into the training and looking after side. .
She works with horses and stabling As for me no I do not ride or trust the beasts

    milkymilo Good that you had chance to try it before - use your cousins old belt. Its good. By me was simillar, 1st belt which I tried was my mum old belt (which she had when was young). Of course was not perfect but after some modifications and ajustmens ok.

    milkymilo polish a few sharp edges and bend into shape

    I love Fancysteel's design ideas, but the dome I bought for my girl also had edges that needed to be reworked, which shouldn't happen with a premium product. I'm impressed your uncle was able to bend the P1 - I would have liked to adjust the metal to the female curve just a little, too, but did not have the impression that the dome itself is bendable?

      Damien
      Everything metal is bendable, just a matter of having the right tools and skills.

        Damien but did not have the impression that the dome itself is bendable

        Probably not the dome, which I read is 3D printed stainless steel, and indeed its shape doesn't look like it's possible to bend it without damaging it. But there are other parts which likely don't need 3D printing but still might need adjustments.
        Do I get it correctly that the dome part is supposed to be "one size fits all", ie. you can't give measurements to get a better fitting part?

          milkymilo well we have both been raised to respect our elders and have faith in they know what they are doing. Yeah I imagine she could have refused but she didn't, not sure her reasons at that age. Yes you are right there are many options out there but that was the idea they put forward as her mother (my aunt) was already wearing one at that time also so you are correct preventing masturbation was also a key focus I believe

          It sounds right, the only question is why your mother was always out of scope, e.g. nobody suggested a chastity belt for her

            milkymilo Sex drive is low I suppose as at 19,

            This is an advantage and yourfrustration should Not too high.

            milkymilo The farm is a high station farm

            What does it mean and what is the difference to a farm?

              Laura If it was introduced by her uncle, then it is not really his place to concern himself with what his wife's sister wears under her pants. Seems a bit unfaithful to care about that.

                Laura the only question is why your mother was always out of scope, e.g. nobody suggested a chastity belt for her

                I don't see this is a big question. Who should have?
                It's important to keep in mind that chastity belts outside of BDSM play are a relatively new phenomenon. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but before internet and foundation of Neosteel (1997) you had to be very much into the kink scene to even know about chastity belts, and the early manufacturers like Tollyboy and Access Denied. The general public may have known the (more or less fake) "medieval" chastity belts from a museum, but except for extremely rare circumstances getting/building and wearing a belt 24/7 was just not an option.
                I have to guess a bit here about the time line, but since Kaitlyn's aunt and uncle are in their 50s, and their daughter is about 27 (17 when locked + 10 years of wearing), it seems plausible it's been very roughly 27 years ago that her husband has the idea to lock Kaitlyn's aunt, and him being the original driver of the idea. Can't be much earlier for the mentioned reasons, but of course a bit later would be possible.
                Now, it's plausible that their experiences have shown them that sexual control/moderation is a desirable thing, and that they would like to see daughter and niece to be locked, too. But who could have suggested it to Kaitlyn's mother? Auntie's husband? Maybe even when Kaitlyn's dad was still in the picture? Sounds invasive, in any case. And it seems unlikely to me that there could have been anyone else in the family knowing about viable chastity belts at that point. There's just not enough time for "generations" to have been locked, and I consider all stories about "family traditions" reaching back longer then the late 90s to be BS.

                  youdontknowme then it is not really his place to concern himself with what his wife's sister wears under her pants

                  But it was aunt who suggested @milkymilo to wear a belt. Not uncle. That's why I asked about siblings in the introduction

                  milkymilo Are other people open about their chastity or is it a very secret thing for most ?

                  i think most people tend to hide it, it's just something sexual and not a topic that needs to be put on public display

                  milkymilo she was belted for 10 years.

                  wow, so she didn't have an orgasm for 10 years? do you know if she had masturbated before, i.e. did she know what was taken from her?

                    Angelina wow, so she didn't have an orgasm for 10 years?

                    No. Search this thread for "tractor" 🙂

                    Marder you had to be very much into the kink scene to even know about chastity belts, and the early manufacturers like Tollyboy and Access Denied.

                    From discussion with Hal at the original Tollyboy and Paul and Brigitta at the original Access Denied, from 20% (AD) to 40% (Tollyboy) of the early production was non-kink and purchased as anti-rape or fidelity assurance.

                      Marder that's right, at least when I ordered it the dome had no sizes or curvatures to choose from. And like you say, the form does not seem to accept bending - unless of course you have access to a blast furnace, curious ^

                        Damien that's right, at least when I ordered it the dome had no sizes or curvatures to choose from

                        Huh, weird. A big advantage of using a 3D printed part would be that every piece you manufacture could be uniquely adapted. Sure, it would require some thought to do the actual fitting, but just producing the exact same part over and over again seems to waste a lot of the potential of the process.

                        milkymilo welcome to the forum and I wish you all the best. If you have any questions, I am more than happy to answer either here or via email!

                          Tjc Interesting! Where is the info from? I'd like to read up on that.

                          But I'm not entirely convinced. For anti-rape or fidelity assurance you don't really need secondary shields. It would be interesting to know if the devices purportedly sold for that purpose had them.
                          Next, I'd really like to know how you would have sold these belts to the general public in pre internet times. Classifieds? The kink scene, on the other hand, always was (well, needed to be) well networked - if necessary, by word of mouth.

                          And finally, what were the production numbers back then? - All in all, I still maintain that non-kink use of chastity belts earlier than the late 90s was a rare occurrence. Maybe not as rare as I thought, but still neglectable in so far that it would need a very good explanation why someone not into kink would come across real world usable chastity belts that early.

                            Marder Yeah, wonder how much of those figures was "no, we're no perverts, wink wink, nudge nudge" and how much was repurposing kink gear for purposes other than kink.

                            Marder Where is the info from? I'd like to read up on that.

                            These were first person discussions with both vendors. I helped Hal with some design changes and helped improve the measurement form that Tollyboy used after our first attempt at measurement did not go well and required a trip to Sheffield to fix. I worked with AD on several belt customization projects.
                            For the Tollyboy, the original purpose of the secondary shield was to prevent pinching in the slot in the front shield.
                            There were classified ads in the back of magazines that were on newsstands at the time. According to Hal, a bunch of orders came after an article in "Skin Two" magazine. It was not kink but more exotic fashion. At the time (late 80s and befor) there was a lot of interest in leather, latex, and rubber fashion in Europe that did not regard themselves as kinky. This scene was also well networked. Hal indicated a lot of his orders came from families in the middle east who were following family tradition.
                            I don't know a lot about production numbers. On both of my visits to Sheffield, there were 5 or 6 belts in production and Hal said they took about a week to 10 days. I don't know about AD numbers. This was a small sideline for another business.

                            • Joh replied to this.
                            • Joh likes this.

                              Tjc It's great that you're here and sharing your experiences from this time with us. As you already wrote. Back then, it was via relevant magazines that were not international. A lot of things from the USA never reached Europe.

                              • Tjc replied to this.