Forum feedbacks, suggestions and notices

Sara2001

Ines I agree, but isn't it possible to hide it until the consensual decision is made?

Angelina

Sara2001

thanks, well said

I agree if some threads are temporarily or completely closed, but some things remain unsaid and wrong facts or impressions about other users remain without requiring clarification.
I hope we can find another solution in the future 🙂

Ines and rest of moderators still have not endorsed my action.

Basically, @Laura has the last word and she trusts you, you're doing it well too, that's the only way to keep something that shouldn't be, especially for new users

Ines

Angelina Basically, @Laura has the last word

Exactly.
She and @Megan are the soul of the site.

Megan

Ines Some time ago I locked a thread about South Africa, and finally this action was revoked.
So, I can understand your opinion, but please think my action as merely preventive.

I think @Laura feels like everyone has a right to speak which is very admirable of her.
But also I would have a better day when @Ines removes things like the South Africa room

Kaja

Megan All this thread might be deleted. This has no connection with cb...
And I disagree totally with waladar AND I BELIEVE HIS STATMENTS ARE is rasist, misoginist and phanatic (sorry waladar, I dont want to hurt you. I dont mean it like offense).

EDITED

Ines

Megan But also I would have a better day when @Ines removes things like the South Africa room

That thread is not my county! 😂 Out of my jurisdiction.

Ines

Kaja I dont want to hurt you

Then, for sure you could use other words.

kat_anders

Kaja I disagree totally with waladar AND I BELIEVE HIS STATMENTS ARE is rasist, misoginist and phanatic (sorry waladar, I dont want to hurt you. I dont mean it like offense).

I don’t see the issue with offending him, as his views clearly offended you, me and several others.

kat_anders

Ines which words would you prefer? Statements that are racist are what, a bit naughty? Misogyny could be called “being a bit of a boy” perhaps?
You’re very keen on editing what you see as offensive words, but not so much on offensive content.
As I said before, you’d be better off banning any political comments and threads, and deleting any that exist. What does South African ethnicity have to do with chastity? It’s just an excuse for the more unpleasant views of some people to be publicly shown. This isn’t helpful to anyone, and probably actively discourages some people.

Ines

kat_anders

kat_anders What does South African ethnicity have to do with chastity?

Nothing.

What part of "IT IS THE ONLY THREAD THAT I DO NOT MODERATE" is so hard for you.
Stop struggling with me, please, I am being very polite.

kat_anders You’re very keen on editing what you see as offensive words, but not so much on offensive content.

That would be censure, I said you several times, I do not censure political opinions.

Angelina

kat_anders You’re very keen on editing what you see as offensive words, but not so much on offensive content.

where is the problem? there are just different opinions and world views, you have to put up with that. i think as long as someone uses polite words they can post controversial content, we should just avoid insults.
if you find a statement by Valadar offensive, then report it to @Laura or @Ines or tell him yourself. i don't always agree with his opinions either, but it is possible to discuss with him without insults.

Ines

kat_anders

You do not see it, because it is edited.
and if you are seeing words like misogyny or racism it is because I have not edited them, obviously. So your comments do not have sense.

Please, be sweet as I am being.

Joh

Ines
I do not post in South African ethnicity and rarely I read any posting their. I see only that Valadar is posting his strange view and no real discussion is happen. I agree with Kaja it has no connection to chastity or similar topic and I would prefer if you would close it.

hanna_anders

Angelina

Angelina if you find a statement by Valadar offensive, then report it

If you look further up the thread you’ll see the response to doing that.

Angelina

hanna_anders If you look further up the thread you’ll see the response to doing that.

if you don't like the answers of the admin/mod team or Valader himself, you have to ignore the thread if it annoys you to read that.

Sara2001 Because it is so tollerant that it supports intolerance.

i would not support the use of racist or sexist insults, but everything else falls under freedom of expression. i don't want to read that someone is promoting christianity here either, but we also have freedom of religion, so i have to tolerate that.

Sara2001

The only thing where I am intolerant is against intolerance. I personally think it shouldn't be accepted. That's why I don't like thread's like the south Africa topic. Because it is so tollerant that it supports intolerance.

Kaja

Angelina true

hanna_anders

Angelina this thread is here in plain view. Why should I just ignore it? Would you let someone speaking utter rubbish that you know to be a complete set of lies just get away with it if you heard them in the street? Or if they posted it in a forum that has nothing to do with the stuff they are trying to tell you? How about if we start spreading a series of lies about other people, is that ok for you too?

hanna_anders

Angelina i would not support the use of racist or sexist insults

but you are - you are defending the person doing exactly that. It's insulting to let obvious lies and scaremongering go unchallenged. Freedom of expression? No such thing. Try telling someone that they are a liar here and you get censored.

Angelina

hanna_anders How about if we start spreading a series of lies about other people, is that ok for you too?

Telling lies about other people is of course wrong, but Valadar is talking about general things and it is just his view of things, you can disagree or ignore, I don't see the problem.

Daniel you can‘t „disagree“ with an objective truth,

i can't really agree with that. what if i see other things as facts? what if i don't trust the person saying those facts? what if i think that person is lying for their own interests?
in my opinion, only a fraction of what are considered objective facts are really impossible to disagree with. a large part are subjective opinions.
there have been so many alleged facts that later became lies, questioning things critically is not denying facts but trying to convince oneself whether the facts are true or not.

I apologise for the post, but I couldn't let it stand.

Joh

hanna_anders I ignore it because for me it makes no sense to answer Valadar. I suppose even if no one answers him, it will just stop when he gets no response to his statement.

Ines

Please do not turn this thread into a judgment on the South Africa thread.
That thread is open because @Laura wants it that way, there is no more reason than that, and that is enough.
Laura is the one who makes this site possible, so absolutely no one can argue with her.
Personally, I do not like that thread, that is why I disregarded it, I do not like what is said or how it is said, but I have to accept it.

A forum is not a democracy, but no one is forced to be here, so if someone is uncomfortable, they already know the exit door.

I think the community would be better off if we put politics aside and focused on chastity belts. I see politics as just a way to erode the community.

Tonyand03

Ines You don't like the South Africa thread but respect Laura's wishes. That makes me appreciate your moderation work all the more.

« Previous Page Next Page »