Secondary shield

Ines

strictfather
To have a shower belted, but with a much better cleanness. Even cleanness of the secondary shield which is usually tight against our lips, and always is a little messy.
And I am little obsessive with the cleanness.

strictfather

? i thought you always had a shower without belt....

Ines

strictfather
No, not ever. Thankfully I am released a lot of times, and in scholar year I have shower unbelted after my training almost everyday.
But specially in weekends that I am belted until Monday or in summer, I do not ask for release every shower I take.
But even belted particular good cleaning of shield is mandatory.

Renita

Ines I think best approach is the 4, more better for the girl and the holders.

I agree with you, but some are contraindicated here

Laura

Ines I do not ask for release every shower I take.

Same for me. If I asked to take the belt off for every shower, it would be suspicious and most likely I would be refused.

Ines

Ines even me that I can Be the wearer with most flexible regime, there are a lot of times in which I am not released of my belt for every shower I take

Vanessa

strictfather

Answer 4.

Laura Secondary shield on a separate lock. Can be attached and detached by girl if she has that key, but belt remains locked.

Except I never get the key.And as @Ines said,it is better to clean myself while belted.

Laura Same for me. If I asked to take the belt off for every shower, it would be suspicious and most likely I would be refused.

Same.More supervised ones is ok when I've my period or when it is very hot,but not every shower.

Laura

Vanessa Except I never get the key.

Any particular reason for this extra lock?

Vanessa

Laura Any particular reason for this extra lock?

Not sure.Probably they think it was better to be able to take it off,even if it was not used.As we often say about computers "which can do the most can do the less"("qui peut le plus peut le moins",in french;not totally true however,I know a couple softwares which not work well if used on actual computers);in this case,better to have the lock and never use it,instead of not having one and wanting to use it...

Laura

Vanessa Probably they think it was better to be able to take it off,even if it was not used.

You are able to take it off even with single lock. The only difference you can unlock the secondary shield without unlocking the belt. But I can't imagine possible usage in your case.

Vanessa in this case,better to have the lock and never use it

But a second lock makes the whole thing more bulky.

Angelina

Laura

I also have 2 separate locks, even though my father has never lost my lock on the secondary shield, it is as Vanessa said, better you have one and you do not need it than you need it and you do not have it

Laura

Angelina better you have one and you do not need it than you need it and you do not have it

But still why might you need it for?

Angelina

Laura

My father would like to be able to disassemble the belt in the event of an emergency. If there is any damage to the belt, he will be better able to judge whether he can repair it himself or if I need a new one

Vanessa

Laura But still why might you need it for?

As long as I know,I'm the first(and maybe the only)woman in our family to have to wear it.So I guess my parents were less experimented about it.They may have thought it would have been useful if I can't wash enough with it on;they may not knew the secondary shield is very effective to prevent a belted woman to masturbate,my mother may have been concerned about periods and chastity belt with secondary shield on...

They may have discovered it does not prevent me to wash or deal with my periods,while preventing me to touch myself when I started to wear it...I haven't asked much about it with them,as I'm not very at ease to discuss my chastity belt with them more than necessarry.

So it can be a totally diffrent reason.And I think they probably wanted to have the more posibilities to cutomize it as they can.

Laura But I'm talking about short shield vs. long.

Short shield in my case,so.

Laura

Angelina We are not talking about my belt where secondary shield can't be detached at all. Such design is ancient and not used anymore.
But I'm talking about short shield vs. long. Should shield is locked by a separate lock, but long shield is located on the same position but continues to the waistband and locked together with main shield by the same lock. No difference for disassembling if both locks are open.

Ines

Laura
In addition to my reasons about usefulness of a second padlock, for me is too a nicer design the short shields.

Angelina

Laura

ok, I probably got it wrong.

I can not really imagine the design do you have a link or pictures?

Laura

Ines In addition to my reasons about usefulness of a second padlock

What are your reasons?

Laura

Angelina I can not really imagine the design do you have a link or pictures?

Neosteel's
Long shield
Short shield

Angelina

Laura

Thank you
the long shield has no separate lock I see that right?

then I have the short sign because I have a separate lock. I hope that I understand correctly

Laura

Angelina the long shield has no separate lock I see that right?

Yes, it's locked in place with main lock.

Angelina

Laura

ah ok then yes, I was with my statement on seperate closures not so far away from the topic😉

In any case, I have the variant on the second picture

« Previous Page Next Page »