Laura "Everything needs to change, so (that) everything can stay the same. "
The Leopard (Italian: Il Gattopardo), a novel by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa.
Mea culpa for my Norwegian habits.
Déjà vu
- Edited
Hi everybody! Recent arrived home 
.
Renta, as my mother has read everything already. They have a lot of experience reading things.
I only have read beltedgirls, and some things were discussed, with more or LESS, success there.
So many fetishist there, even some forum user was good.
Laura
If I try to follow your reasoning, you estimate that pool represented the philosophy of the population in 2003.
And do you think there are now fewer followers of the belt than 16 years ago?
Have I translated your thought well?
Because for my part I think the nombers of de pro -belted are been already over-valued in 2003.
Always with the same reasoning in my previous post.
I was also told that the early 2000s were flooded by the fetishist as soon as the topic of CB was discussed.
- Edited
Ines Recital, as my mother has read everything already.
Maybe she can contribute to the topic with ancient stories from older forums/groups
Esteban And do you think there are now fewer followers of the belt than 16 years ago?
Much more in my opinion. But I'm of newer generation, so it's harder to evaluate what was going on 16 years ago.
Laura Beaucoup plus à mon avis. Mais je suis de nouvelle génération, il est donc difficile d'évaluer ce qui se passait il y a 16 ans.
In fact I thought about the evolution of the development of chastity belts.
And here is my analysis.
We can assume that there are fewer parents who wish to restrict the sexual freedom of their daughter but that there are paradoxically more girls with girdles.
I develop my reasoning:
The evolution of morals goes in the direction of sex liberation (sex toy ...) but at the same time the development of the internet has made it easier for parents to acquire a chastity belt for their daughter.
Therefore, we would have an increase in the number of girls girded by their parents while having fewer parents who would like to gird their daughter.
Do you understand the subtlety of the paradox?
- Edited
Esteban We can assume that there are fewer parents who wish to restrict the sexual freedom of their daughter but that there are paradoxically more girls with girdles.
Why can we assume it? Do you know what is the most popular search engines' query for this forum? "daughter chastity belt". I see it from the stats.
- Edited
Hum,30% who not do it if she doesn't agree is not bad,but there is 31% in total who think she should wear one,without any concerns about if she agrees or not...
Laura Maybe she can contribute to the topic with ancient stories from older forums/groups
It could be interesting,yes.
I hope they read us carefully,and understand their daughters should not be forced to wear a chastity belt if they don't agree willingly...
- Edited
Laura Why can we assume it? Do you know what is the most popular search engines' query for this forum? "daughter chastity belt". I see it from the stats.
We can assume in the old days that there used to be many more parents who wanted to control and restrain their daughter's sexuality in order to avoid the scandal of an unwanted pregnancy (especially when neither the contraceptive pill nor the abortion was not legal in most countries)
Then with the evolution of sexual liberation it is legitimate to think that the number of oppressing parents has considerably diminished because of the liberation of morals. However, since there is now a facility to obtain such an device, it can be deduced that a very small minority of parents try their luck by wanting to appropriate such an object.
Because before the arrival of the internet it was almost impossible for a parent wishing to belted his daughter to find such a device.
Besides, it is not trivial to see that there is a lot of germans girls belted. And I understanded that the main manufacturer was German. This tends to show that it is the ease with which to obtain this type of object that increases the number of belted girls. But there are not necessarily more parents who are eager to suppress their daughter's sexuality that before. And that's the paradox of my demonstration.
I expected exactly this result, that would not be any different here. no cb forced but if it is voluntary it is ok
yes it is 31% that would close their daughters also, if this does not agree but if we read our stories here, will certainly get out a higher percentage, so I do not think that this survey was answered only by fetishists, otherwise the forced number much higher
Angelina yes it is 31% that would close their daughters also, if this does not agree but if we read our stories here, will certainly get out a higher percentage, so I do not think that this survey was answered only by fetishists, otherwise the forced number much higher
Right,for the majority of us,we didn't(and still don't)willingly agree to wear a chastity belt,so probably more then 31% of us have to wear one while not agreeing.
I told my mother she must check this thread, for sure she has interesting ideas.
But let me make a reflection, Do not you think that sexuality of the girls was less problematic in 2003 than in 2019. I am young but , and at least in Spain, in last couple of years, that is about I have references, all is hyper sexualized.
Maybe, even for me that I am strong believer in willing wearing,Can be that there are more parents that need a resource as a belt today than in 2003.
I was too young at this time to notice it,but according to what I read or heard,it seems people find it is more problematic now than before;but I don't know if "before" was intended as "long before",like during our mother or grandmother generation,or only "some years before".
I'm not sure it is more "common" to wear a chastity belt presently,however.I read,but don't know if it's true,that,at the start of 20th century,some catalogs were selling chastity tubes,and presented it as an anti-masturbation device.Sure,it was a male chastity device,but,if they existed and were sold,they were probably some ways to get(ans use)chastity belts too.Even more as female masturbation was(and is)often considered more badly than male masturbation...
Vanessa ,it seems people find it is more problematic now than before;but I don't know if "before" was intended as "long before",like during our mother or grandmother generation,or only "some years before".
I am not talking about 2003 , I was barely one year old, but I have noticed in very last few years.
When I was 12 I had still some toys, now with that age, some girls are having sex with boys or buying vodka in supermarkets!
Of course it is fault of parents, they failed miserably, and then, those parents think that a chastity belt can be a choice...
To be parents is one of the most difficult thing to be, I am not criminalize them for fail, but, reality is that.
Probably parents that take in consideration a chastity belt as last resource, bad approach in my opinion, is higher nowadays that in 2015, and probably more than in 2003.
I think.
exactly because of what @Ines says, I am of the opinion that the cb is again more represented, the girls in the teenage age become ripe today always earlier, many already with 12 .
i think that exactly this development makes sure that the cb is sold again more to worried parents, who don't want the 12 year old daughter to have sex already or get pregnant.
i myself wear the cb for other reasons, but i think the precociousness of the girls is the most important point for parents to buy a cb
- Edited
Sorry girls but I think you all have a totally distorted idea of the reality in relation to your situations. This study is worth absolutely nothing because I repeat that it has ABSOLUTELY not been validated by a representative sample.
And to try to demonstrate it to you I gave myself to a small calculation:
If I add only the populations of the European Union, the United States, Brazil and Russia I get a total of 496 million people.
I divide this number by two to estimate the number of women 496/2 = 248 million women.
I determine age class of potentially lockable girls in a belt is between 15 and 30 years (ie a limited life span to a duration of 15 years)
Since life expectancy is around 80, I deduce that the number of women of potential age to be girded by their parents in these 4 countries is:
248 million x 15/80e => 46,5 million women.
In practical terms this means that at least 465,000 women should declare themselves on your forum so that it can only represent 1% of locked women. You will agree that we are far from the account since you are less than a hundred.
This result allows me to conclude:
In the West there are potentially fewer girls locked in chastity belts than winning the national lottery!
Your situations of belted girls correspond to very rare situations.
Indeed if you were 10,000 to be locked throughout the European Union (out of a total of 24 Million women between 15 and 30 years old) you would only represent a proportion of 1 out of 2400 or 0.04% of potentially lockable womens .
I sincerely hope that my demonstration will have opened your eyes a little to the reality of the world around you.