Déjà vu
Relevant Yahoo poll
"Do you agree that a parent has the right to use a chastity belt to preserve an underage daughter's virginity, prevent excessive masturbation or prevent her sleeping around?
- Yes, any of above would be a perfectly legitimate use of a chastity belt
- Yes on balance, but only if she would otherwise be putting herself at risk through underage sex
- Yes to preserve her virginity
- Yes, to prevent promiscuity
- Yes to prevent any masturbation
- Yes, though only to prevent excessive masturbation
- Unsure / really depends on situation
- Only if she fully consented to it
- Never, it would be psychologically damaging
- Never, it would be against her basic rights
- Never, and such a parent should be prosecuted"
- Edited
Renita
Only one answer is far from obvious to me.
I'm explain :
If the parents exert any slightest moral constraint in order to extort the consent of the girl I will be in perfect agreement with the last three proposals.
• Never, it would be psychologically damaging
• Never, it would be against her basic rights
• Never, and such a parent should be prosecuted"
But if the young woman believes that her belt will act as a protection against the potential male aggressors or can help her to get rid of a compulsive masturbatory practice that spoils her life, the 8th proposal « Only if she fully consented » to it remains acceptable.
Provided however that the girl is regular breaks to relieve himself (minimum of one hour each tonight before going to bed). She must not be trapped after accepting the principle of the belt.
Indeed if a girl agrees each evening a small moment of intimate happiness before falling asleep it would be far from compulsive masturbation as it presented at the beginning of the statement the question.
Between compulsive masturbation and prohibited masturbation there is room for compromise. No ?
- Edited
Angelina
Started 24 Dec, 2003
- Yes, any of above would be a perfectly legitimate use of a chastity belt 9%
- Yes on balance, but only if she would otherwise be putting herself at risk through underage sex 2%
- Yes to preserve her virginity 6%
- Yes, to prevent promiscuity 9%
- Yes to prevent any masturbation 4%
- Yes, though only to prevent excessive masturbation 2%
- Unsure / really depends on situation 5%
- Only if she fully consented to it 30%
- Never, it would be psychologically damaging 11%
- Never, it would be against her basic rights 12%
- Never, and such a parent should be prosecuted 10%
- Edited
Renita
His results are not exploitable.
Because to be meaningful a survey must be done according to a representative sample.
Moreover, we can legitimately assume that the most liberal parents will not have the idea of researching such issues beacuse they will find the absurd the original idea.
The other hand the sexual perverts will be the first to share their opinion in order to externalize their fantasy.
We all have that the theme of CB attract fetishists.
Laura "Everything needs to change, so (that) everything can stay the same. "
The Leopard (Italian: Il Gattopardo), a novel by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa.
Mea culpa for my Norwegian habits.
- Edited
Hi everybody! Recent arrived home 
.
Renta, as my mother has read everything already. They have a lot of experience reading things.
I only have read beltedgirls, and some things were discussed, with more or LESS, success there.
So many fetishist there, even some forum user was good.
Laura
If I try to follow your reasoning, you estimate that pool represented the philosophy of the population in 2003.
And do you think there are now fewer followers of the belt than 16 years ago?
Have I translated your thought well?
Because for my part I think the nombers of de pro -belted are been already over-valued in 2003.
Always with the same reasoning in my previous post.
I was also told that the early 2000s were flooded by the fetishist as soon as the topic of CB was discussed.
- Edited
Ines Recital, as my mother has read everything already.
Maybe she can contribute to the topic with ancient stories from older forums/groups
Esteban And do you think there are now fewer followers of the belt than 16 years ago?
Much more in my opinion. But I'm of newer generation, so it's harder to evaluate what was going on 16 years ago.
Laura Beaucoup plus à mon avis. Mais je suis de nouvelle génération, il est donc difficile d'évaluer ce qui se passait il y a 16 ans.
In fact I thought about the evolution of the development of chastity belts.
And here is my analysis.
We can assume that there are fewer parents who wish to restrict the sexual freedom of their daughter but that there are paradoxically more girls with girdles.
I develop my reasoning:
The evolution of morals goes in the direction of sex liberation (sex toy ...) but at the same time the development of the internet has made it easier for parents to acquire a chastity belt for their daughter.
Therefore, we would have an increase in the number of girls girded by their parents while having fewer parents who would like to gird their daughter.
Do you understand the subtlety of the paradox?
- Edited
Esteban We can assume that there are fewer parents who wish to restrict the sexual freedom of their daughter but that there are paradoxically more girls with girdles.
Why can we assume it? Do you know what is the most popular search engines' query for this forum? "daughter chastity belt". I see it from the stats.
- Edited
Hum,30% who not do it if she doesn't agree is not bad,but there is 31% in total who think she should wear one,without any concerns about if she agrees or not...
Laura Maybe she can contribute to the topic with ancient stories from older forums/groups
It could be interesting,yes.
I hope they read us carefully,and understand their daughters should not be forced to wear a chastity belt if they don't agree willingly...
- Edited
Laura Why can we assume it? Do you know what is the most popular search engines' query for this forum? "daughter chastity belt". I see it from the stats.
We can assume in the old days that there used to be many more parents who wanted to control and restrain their daughter's sexuality in order to avoid the scandal of an unwanted pregnancy (especially when neither the contraceptive pill nor the abortion was not legal in most countries)
Then with the evolution of sexual liberation it is legitimate to think that the number of oppressing parents has considerably diminished because of the liberation of morals. However, since there is now a facility to obtain such an device, it can be deduced that a very small minority of parents try their luck by wanting to appropriate such an object.
Because before the arrival of the internet it was almost impossible for a parent wishing to belted his daughter to find such a device.
Besides, it is not trivial to see that there is a lot of germans girls belted. And I understanded that the main manufacturer was German. This tends to show that it is the ease with which to obtain this type of object that increases the number of belted girls. But there are not necessarily more parents who are eager to suppress their daughter's sexuality that before. And that's the paradox of my demonstration.
I expected exactly this result, that would not be any different here. no cb forced but if it is voluntary it is ok
yes it is 31% that would close their daughters also, if this does not agree but if we read our stories here, will certainly get out a higher percentage, so I do not think that this survey was answered only by fetishists, otherwise the forced number much higher