Should only females get belted?

Ines

Tobbe
Is not very practical in some cases. For example I can unwear it various times at a day.

Tobbe

Ines Of course, it depends on the circumstances. If you are at home, or together with your parents, you can of course use the padlock alone. If, on the other hand, you want to go out alone and maybe not come home all day, then I would have completed the padlock with a numbered seal.

Ines

Mmmmmm. Anyway, I do not like the idea. I think that maybe is go a bit further in my opinion.
I have ever felt that I wear my belt for misstrusts of my parents, but as a symbol of the woman I wish to be.
I think that mix belts and misstrusts is not very sane, and it put us in a very weak position.
And anyway, a padlock is quite safe! 😆

Max9

Ines And anyway, a padlock is quite safe! 😆

That's the most important part of all for sure.👍

Yes, might be. But being locked by the father of your girlfriend for example would clarify the position. Till wedding the father still is the head of her family, also about his daughter. And this supremacy wouldn't be touched by her girlfriend. Till wedding, when he takes over her keys and the supremacy in his newly created family. And gets unlocked by her father by that. What do you think about this idea? 🤔

Ines

I do not understand you.

Max9 Just imagine your daughter giving a blowjob to a boy or having anal sex with him.

😶. What Is the point of this? I hope to can educate my daughter in good form, but we'll, if she decides make a blowjob to her boyfriend, at the end, there is not nothing we can do to avoid it.

Max9 Yes, might be. But being locked by the father of your girlfriend for example would clarify the position.

I do not have boyfriend, strictu sensu, nowadays, but for me is not acceptable that my keyholder was another person than my parents or my husband. In a extreme situation, maybe, maybe, maybe, I could ask my elder brother that I adore, but I do not have clear it and either if he would accept.

Vanessa

Max9

Firstly,I think no one should have to wear a chastity belt/cage against his/her will.

Secondly,I voted "Yes" mainly because I think it is pretty safe for a woman to wear a chastity belt permanently,but way more risked for a man.

Tobbe

Because,if the woman is careful,masturbating(not excessively)and having sex(if protected and not with anyone)is way less dangerous.

Laura

I agree.

Max9 First of all, because you can also be raped as a Male. And that is said to happen about as often as with females being the victims.

But a chastity belt is not that much a rape protection; as @Sara2001(I think)said,a rapist can still hurt us emotionally a lot,even if we wear a chastity belt.

Max9 Then, not having the chance to orgasm might change the attitude from relationships that are mainly based on sex to a more emotional based relationship.

If there is true love,it would be the case without a chastity belt too.

Angelina the education is in my opinion completely failed and these parents are then also unsuitable as key holders

I agree.A chastity belt should never be used instead of a talk.

Angelina masturbation is perfectly normal

I totally agree!😉

Max9

It's why we tend to "prefer" abstinence belt.

HHelen

This expression exists in french too!😉

Tobbe

It is not about locks literally!😉

Sara2001

It seems it is more a fetish for men,but I think there is some who have to wear it reluctantly too.But wearing a chastity device for the initial purpose is more common for women,I think(even if my twin has sometimes to wear his chastity cage as a punishment).

Max9

I think that,if we love our partner,we should care about him/her,without having to wear a chastity device....Same for men and women.

And I don't think being prevented to masturbate or not is related to it.

Max9

I don't think it is right.Even if the man wear it willingly,it should be locked by his parents,not by his girlfriend's father.It is not his role.My parents hesitated a lot due to it,when Emilie and me asked about locking her in a chastity belt during the night,when we share a bed...And they would not have accepted at the start of our relationship.

Angelina

If I have a boyfriend wearing a chastity cage,I would accept it(and support him if it is reluctantly).But even if he would have to wear a chastity cage while I wouldn't have to wear a chastity belt,I wouldn't feel him more submissive.It would depends mainly of his personality,I think.I've to wear a chastity belt,but I can still be rebellious,and I don't feel submissive with Emilie.

If the man wear a chastity cage,while his girlfriend/wife has the keys...It depends.I think it would be more related to their relationship,how they feel,why he wears it and not her,etc...

Max9

You should have posted all these posts in only one(even by editing them if you got oher thoughts after posting a post)...

Max9

I can imagine some parents wouldn't be too uncomfortable with this idea. Just imagine your daughter giving a blowjob to a boy or having anal sex with him.
How do you guys, as parents think about it considering these thoughts?
(By the way, I'm not trying to offend you in any way for you opinion, @Ines , if it might seem that way. Or trying to convince you.
I'm just curious to know what you guys think about certain ideas to certain scenarios )

Max9

I mean the father is the head of the family. But when a daughter has a boyfriend her father might loose his status concerning his daughter. Because she is now a couple with a boy. So if the boy was cadged by her father he would still remain head of the whole family, including the daughter

Edit: because when you're in a relationship with someone you might forget a bit about your role as being a good daughter. And be a bit ... let's say obident ... to her boyfriend. This reduces the .... "obidence" ... to her father.

Ines

Max9
Bufff, no, not at all. If a boy is not able to respect her girl, bye.
I would not be interested. I "gift" him with some authority about some aspects, but it is not free at all.
He has to be my shelter, my support and appreciate the sacrifice of the girls, we the weares give power to keyholder, but a lot of responsibility, our "subordination" position is a "poisonous present" 😂.
And in my case, I see a belted boy as a boy dependable of their keyholder, and I want to be the only dependable person in relationship! 😅

Max9

Ines dependable of their keyholder

Well, dependable of your father till marriage. The day he would take over responsibility.

You have some good points indeed

Max9

Of course, respect trust and loyalty is fundamental for a relationship

Angelina

Max9

i generally consider a chastity belt unnecessary, only if it should, it should be equal for all

Natescage when kids that young are having sex eather they were sexualy abused, were exposed to sex or porn or have extremely neglectful parents.

this is unfortunately mostly the case, in such families also no chastity belt helps, it is mandatory a family therapy

Max9

Angelina i generally consider a chastity belt unnecessary

I also did, but not anymore. But I'm fully on your site with it having to be equal to both, Male and female, if it is strongly recommended to be worn at all.
If not, and you want to be the sex that is to be protected by a man you can choose a man that isn't cadged or is cadged and even though strong enough for you

Angelina

Max9

i think even a man with a belt can have a good relationship. this is especially the case if the young man is belted by his parents. if it is the girlfriend, however, i think the man automatically assumes the submissive role

Ines

Max9 If not, and you want to be the sex that is to be protected by a man you can choose a man that isn't cadged or is cadged and even though strong enough for you

Of course not, in my case. For me, chastity is so girly as heels or skirts, sorry (I think they would not worry for this new, I am not so diva), but I am not attracted for that concept! 😅

Johnathan

Ines Would it make a difference if both the husband and wife were locked until it was time to have intercourse, vs only the wife being locked? The husband is can still assume a dominant role in the marriage. I wouldn't mind wearing the cage, and would still assume a dominant role in the relationship.

Angelina

Ines For me, chastity is so girly as heels

now we have found the reason why we have different opinions 😂

Johnathan I wouldn't mind wearing the cage, and would still assume a dominant role in the relationship.

if you can do that, I don't want to stop you 😉 but in most cases the man would then take the submissive role (at least if the woman does not wear a belt)

if both wear a belt it is equal again

Christine

HHelen A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

I have heard it before.

Ines

Johnathan
And who is the husband's keyholder? No... And the Mere fact is not of my taste.
The lovely moment of being umbelted is mine only! At least in my case!

Max9

Ines Her mother could be her keyholder and bis father could be his one. Or they could type keys for each other... sounds pretty romantic indeed 🤔 giving your partner the ability or orgasm as a present.

Well, I think virginity at girls is something worth to be saved till she found the right one... which also means marriage. And for example if I had to go on a business trip I would want her to want me to hold her keys.
So it'd only be fair if also teenage boys were locked, because they also want to masturbate - but they could, if they weren't locked. The girls couldn't. They could be locked by their fathers. And when grown up and I would have to go for a business trip I think I would also offer my wife my keys, to show her I mean it serious that I don't want to cheat on her. It's more that to me, a singn of "I want to be sure, I wouldn't even have the chance to cheat on you, even if I wanted to - what is not the case, of course. "

Max9

Well, I also sort of want a girl that isn't lower than me in the ranking anyhow.
Of course, I would want to make important financial decisions of what I brought into the marriage, like selling "my" house or my car fully on my own.
And I would want to always be there for her and protect her in any ways. And I would want to be the one who earns the money.
But I also would want a girl / wife that would support me and also be there for me if things are getting difficult and maybe I feel down. "Behind every strong man, there's a strong wife".
So I personally wouldn't want a girl that want to be the only person to be protected and that only she receives support by her strong partner. If some girls want it, alright. If some men are maybe super strong so they fell like they never need support and rest ... alright, then it does fit. But I personally want a relationship where each partner gives a feeling of concealment to the other one when needed.

Doesn't mean I wouldn't want to be the strong one in a relationship. But anyhow I would want us both to be strong for each other

« Previous Page Next Page »