Is Fancy-Steel a viable option for secure long time wear
Joh I agree.
Nevertheless I like to discuss with you even if it sometimes takes longer to get all the information. With others I have given up when only one short sentence comes. Even if I go far back I can't find out what it's about. It would be a waste of time to continue.
i also like to discuss with you even if we often disagree and yes sometimes you ask very specificly but i also admit that i am not always very clear because i try to write as simply as possible. 
toad I think it is just a question of time before someone appears here with such a belt. It seems to me that it would be very tempting to some parents that they would be able to control their offspring even when they are not at home. With the remote unlocking, it becomes feasible to keep someone chaste who is no longer living at home, because no parent needs to be present for sanitary breaks, sports, doctor visits, etc. With just a tap on a phone the belt comes off. Of course the parent still needs to have some leverage (like financial support) to make the wearer put it on again, but then with a video chat they can check that the belt is put back on correctly at the appointed time. (At least I assume that the belt will be able to determine by itself if it is locked again, but not if it is actually worn, and by the right person, so a visual check would still be needed.)
And the scariest part is that even though such a belt might be bought simply for the remote release option, the disciplinary options, like electroshocks, are at the parent's finger tips as well, and thereby quite tempting to be used.
carg And the scariest part is that even though such a belt might be bought simply for the remote release option, the disciplinary options, like electroshocks, are at the parent's finger tips as well, and thereby quite tempting to be used.
If parents think in electroshock their daughters, they are crazy, sick or even worse.
It is not serious. I doubt any parents thought about it.
- Edited
Ines That feature shall only be used by fetishists, there you are totally right ... but on the pther hand there are still parents who spank their children ... that would be about the same as an electric shock ... both is a form of abuse, but there are many mad people out there, so it could indeed happen eventhough it is not tl happen.
Avery Yes, I felt protected. I could not have masturbated but that's OK. All I wanted was to make sure no one could force themselves on me.
after more than a month i don't know in which context i wrote that, but i understand that it is ok for you, you don't wear the belt permenently either.
electroshocks should really only be used by fetishists, but i think the remote control and gps function might be interesting for parents, but i don't think the belt built by fancysteel is useful for daily use
Jen do you sleep in yours much? How does that go? I think I've got the wrong type of belt
Very rarely. Only when sleeping in the dorm when roommates have guys over and then sometimes I fear I might be assaulted. It was at college that I was assaulted twice in my first year so I am rather over sensitive about it. It's pretty comfy though, I'm glad I got the slim fit and I don't wear it too tight because I'm not trying to prevent masturbation so that might help.
Personally,I think he/she would be a troll.
Ines It is not serious. I doubt any parents thought about it.
I doubt it too.
Max9 spank
I get spanked,but they would not make me wear such belt.
Angelina gps function might be interesting for parents
This one,probably,yes.
Angelina the belt built by fancysteel is useful for daily use
Probably not,mainly for fetish games.
Still hard to sleep with it on?
- Edited
Ines It is not serious. I doubt any parents thought about it.
I guess you have more faith in humanity than me. I've heard so many crazy reports about disturbing parent behavior, that I dread such features would be used, if so easily accessible (that is, if the wearer was already in such a belt), and the parent is upset. I do agree that it would take a pretty sick parent to deliberately select a chastity belt that they can give eletroshocks with. Personally I'm not in favor of electroshocks even for fetish play, because there is always a small risk of an unknown heart issue that might be triggered. Apart from that I am not into S/M anyway.
Angelina i don't think the belt built by fancysteel is useful for daily use
I agree that the belt was undoubtedly built for fetish play, but even some of those go for 24/7, and Fancysteel does have experience in making belts suitable for long-term wear. (Actually I would be disappointed if I would pay so much for a belt only to find out it gets unwearable after a few hours.) Of course the recharging would be a downside, and I can't judge how good it would work with urination; even if the three small holes would be enough to not hamper the flow, cleaning afterwards with a water bottle would seem scary to me. Is that why you don't think it is suitable for long time wear?
I think I read a post here about the vulnerabilities of the electronic padlock the locking system is supposed to be based on, but I don't think those vulnerabilities would be valid for the belt, since the locking mechanism looks to be all inside.
carg I think I read a post here about the vulnerabilities of the electronic padlock the locking system is supposed to be based on, but I don't think those vulnerabilities would be valid for the belt, since the locking mechanism looks to be all inside.
If it has a wireless connection than is their a possibility to hack the system and open the lock. I presume who wrote the software is not a specialist in security.
Joh The vulnerabilities mentioned were about being able to bare the point where the hasp connects, and opening it that way, and that the electronics could be reached, though he could not get the lock open by fiddling with the electronics. Of course electronic locks are not unhackable, but it might need more specialized equipment and knowledge than lockpicking. It could get scary though when the hacker can trigger the discipline functions 
Avery and I don't wear it too tight because I'm not trying to prevent masturbation so that might help.
but it could also rub uncomfortably against the skin if it's not tight, right?
carg Is that why you don't think it is suitable for long time wear?
are we talking about fancysteel in general or these high-tech electric belt? (just to clarify)
i think most fancysteel belts look very insecure, the shield looks so small that i can't imagine that the belt protects against fraud.
the high tech electric belt is different, it looks very safe, but because of the additional functions it is a bit expensive. i wouldn't rule out that parents use the power function on their children, very unlikely, but i also could never imagine that there are parents who buy chastity belts for their daughters.