Ines It is not serious. I doubt any parents thought about it.
I guess you have more faith in humanity than me. I've heard so many crazy reports about disturbing parent behavior, that I dread such features would be used, if so easily accessible (that is, if the wearer was already in such a belt), and the parent is upset. I do agree that it would take a pretty sick parent to deliberately select a chastity belt that they can give eletroshocks with. Personally I'm not in favor of electroshocks even for fetish play, because there is always a small risk of an unknown heart issue that might be triggered. Apart from that I am not into S/M anyway.
Angelina i don't think the belt built by fancysteel is useful for daily use
I agree that the belt was undoubtedly built for fetish play, but even some of those go for 24/7, and Fancysteel does have experience in making belts suitable for long-term wear. (Actually I would be disappointed if I would pay so much for a belt only to find out it gets unwearable after a few hours.) Of course the recharging would be a downside, and I can't judge how good it would work with urination; even if the three small holes would be enough to not hamper the flow, cleaning afterwards with a water bottle would seem scary to me. Is that why you don't think it is suitable for long time wear?
I think I read a post here about the vulnerabilities of the electronic padlock the locking system is supposed to be based on, but I don't think those vulnerabilities would be valid for the belt, since the locking mechanism looks to be all inside.