Chastity belt law
Angelina right, i personally would like it better if the men had to wear a belt too, but the actual goal is also achieved if it is only the women wear one.
Now would the women be able to have time outs to masturbate? If not, just having the women belted would be very unfair. Sounds like a law promulgated by the men.
Max9 Some believe it's important to prevent masturbations,
True enough. This always confuses me. From a religious perspective the commandments say though shalt not commit adultery nor covert thy neighbors wife but nothing about masturbation. Also, getting pregnant at the wrong time hurts one's course in life and not losing one's virginity is important to some but these have nothing to do with masturbation.
- Edited
Avery because it doesn't. There are judt some people who wsnt to give up the habit of masturbation and others who don't like the imagination that their "small child" would masturbate and thus become mature. And there are some, like me, who like that it gives them a feeling of concealment and safety, as well as the ones who wear it because of dominant / submissive structures in their relationship or the one to whom it is just their sexuality / fetish.
Avery Not this man. I am all for equal-opportunity chastity. And plenty of male chastity fetishists are into female supremacy. As long as the women have the exact desires those men fantasize about, of course 
youdontknowme And plenty of male chastity fetishists are into female supremacy. As long as the women have the exact desires those men fantasize about, of course
Nice take on that.
Avery Now would the women be able to have time outs to masturbate? If not, just having the women belted would be very unfair. Sounds like a law promulgated by the men.
exactly so that this injustice does not arise, this law would have to be valid for women and for men, or there must be legally regulated fixed breaks installed, which must be monitored so that the women do not have sex.
Angelina exactly so that this injustice does not arise, this law would have to be valid for women and for men, or there must be legally regulated fixed breaks installed, which must be monitored so that the women do not have sex.
A new business could be created, like suntan parlors, where you go in, have your belt removed and enter a small cubicle where you could undress and recline for an hour and do what suits you. Absolutely no men allowed. There could be a kiosk in each store where customers could rent a vibrator or a lovense or what have you.
Would probably have to be quite thoroughly regulated to make sure everyone is safely locked back up before entering a mixed-sex area again.
Angelina that sounds interesting. i think if that really became reality, i might reconsider my professional future. you could get rich with that
It could revolutionize the idea of a daily lunch break. One could buy a sandwich and get yourself off all in the same establishment. It would put McDonalds out of business.
Avery Tuna fish sandwich?
Angelina so even if they are only separated for one day?
Yes,even if it can take more time until the divorce is completed.
Angelina he would then have to remarry
Yes.
Only if she's unfaithful.
And she may hesitate,even in this case,as,if her husband discover it and want to divorce,she would have to wear a chastity belt too.
Laura That should be the main purpose of this law, e.g. to have sex with the spouse only
I guess it would be at least one of the main purposes,yes.
Less fair,but almost as effective.
I guess no.
Especially at it would be hard to find a way for letting a belted woman masturbate,but only at a set time,and not able to have sex,even oral sex.
But yes,it would be unfair,if men don't have to wear a chastity cage.
Angelina there must be legally regulated fixed breaks installed, which must be monitored so that the women do not have sex.
I think it would be very hard to manage.
Even if I doubt it would be that easy to create,it would be a good idea.
youdontknowme Would probably have to be quite thoroughly regulated to make sure everyone is safely locked back up before entering a mixed-sex area again.
well, it could be different places. studios for women only and studios for men only and the operators are controlled by the state.
Avery It could revolutionize the idea of a daily lunch break. One could buy a sandwich and get yourself off all in the same establishment. It would put McDonalds out of business.
you are right 
Vanessa Yes,even if it can take more time until the divorce is completed.
doesn't a judge do that?
Vanessa I think it would be very hard to manage.
It's not easy, but I think if the state really wanted it, it could be done. 