• General
  • Potential Improvements if Chastity Belt Becomes Mainstream

Otherwise maybe have chastity contracts rexogised ahd legally enfirceable.

    Greatcornbow

    Greatcornbow

    both would probably happen, the question is whether that would really be good if a chastity belt becomes mainstream, that could open the door for real abuse (by parents or even the state) very wide

      Angelina both would probably happen, the question is whether that would really be good if a chastity belt becomes mainstream, that could open the door for real abuse (by parents or even the state) very wide

      There would of course need tp be safeguards against abuse. especially re minors

      Maybe supplier could retain remote lock for period or e.g. till fully paid , say on hire purchase or similar. Ace security!

        I would like a shield that attaches without the additional paraphenalia, like the bum strap and waist band. Just a skin-safe adhesive that holds something like a dome shield in place.

          Sin I think it could be possible with implanted pieces on which the shield is fastened. The implants would be placed under the skin and have a wide base so that they cannot be pulled out but are so small that they do not interfere with anything else.

            Joh
            And the part penetrating the skin is the ideal conduit for bacteria to reach the implant.

            • Joh replied to this.

              curious
              Yes, piercing is always a higher risk for infection.

                Angelina but would then have to be regulated in the contract

                O yes. Including interest of course. And contract could alao stipulate period of time etc. All sorts of scope.

                  Joh
                  What you describe is not a normal piercing but is called a dermal anchor.
                  You want a larger part to remain embedded under the skin. A piercing will most likely heal and once it it completely healed, the risk of infection is only slightly elevated. With a dermal anchor however, the risk for an infection is very high.

                  Greatcornbow O yes. Including interest of course. And contract could alao stipulate period of time etc. All sorts of scope.

                  somehow gives me the idea that manufacturers could expand their business model, real chastity agencies could be created with ideal solutions for every customer, including chastity programmes etc.

                    Angelina Could see a chastity bank becoming a thing going down that road, use the belt as collateral.
                    Given all these ideas I think it’s probably best things stay as they are though

                      Angelina somehow gives me the idea that manufacturers could expand their business model, real chastity agencies could be created with ideal solutions for every customer, including chastity programmes etc.

                      Why not? All sorts of scope and potential here. They could program another to be KH or be KH themselves or any combibation.

                      Could also be time limited, e.g. till wedding or graduation or whatever. IOr till fully paid or anything else.

                      For my personal is the best benefits when it is more Mainstream, that you can wear it also during security checks and other situations where of this moment is not done or not public is accepted. I've not interesting in a more fancy belt.

                      If it became mainstream there will be more way to cheat the belt, and there will be tools specifically made to bypass it.

                        Milord If it became mainstream there will be more way to cheat the belt, and there will be tools specifically made to bypass it.

                        Maybe. But also increased security methods to counter.

                          Greatcornbow it is very difficult to have static object counter evolving trend. Today creating a vibrator to bypass chastity belt will be economically non convenient.
                          If more people get belted, it could be much more marketable. There will be some keyolholder so interested in security that will pay any sum to keep up and be sure that her beltee is unable to slip even a single time. But mostly will just be happy with basic security

                            Milord But mostly will just be happy with basic security

                            Probably, most people don’t have very secure locks on their homes or other places they want to keep people out of, but they’re satisfied with a basic lock.
                            Provides enough to slow someone down and make them think about it. Chastity belts aren’t much different, just needs to keep it closed and slow someone down

                              Sasha

                              My personal idea is that most parents seem more interested in preventing masturbation than sex. So the reluctant wearer has a lot of interest in cheating the belt.
                              Even the most enthusiastic wearer fight it now or then

                              • Ines replied to this.