Emergency key
- Edited
Angelina perhaps a combination lock with 6-10 digits attached directly to the belt?
They are easy to break. As I mentioned in another topic, I would prefer an electronic lock
Philip A 6 digit combination would take about 5 weeks of continuous guessing to crack it. 10 digits would take longer than about 12 lifetimes to break.
But you can guess them due the nature of the mechanism
Angelina i.e. a chastity belt with a combination lock
Nobody wants it
Laura They are easy to break. As I mentioned in another topic, I would prefer an electronic lock
easier than a normal padlock with a key? i doubt it.
Laura Nobody wants it
i think if it were designed securely, there would be a high demand, especially among people like us, because then the discussion about the emergency key would be solved.
Philip might be a good idea to change the combination lock every day of the year. That would take it above 4k years.
that's what my father would do, but i'm all about principle. i have an emergency system, but admittedly it could be better. with a number combination i would only have to send my father a whatsapp and he could give it to me within a minute.
Angelina PS: has anyone actually read about such a chastity belt, i.e. a chastity belt with a combination lock, if so where
I would imagine that it would only take a fairly minor modification on belts that are fastened with a padlock.
Getting a compact padlock with more than 4 digits is abit more challenging, though.
- you will win freedom. But I know that you can not make it at home...Angelina perhaps a combination lock with 6-10 digits attached directly to the belt?
yeah, but that would be pretty big for the belt. Not able to be hidden under the clothes.
How about a keysafe with a password? Or a remote keysafe via Bluetooth Tethering? Like that the keyholder only can open the safe with his cellphone.
youdontknowme I would imagine that it would only take a fairly minor modification on belts that are fastened with a padlock.
i would at least consider it better than using a padlock so far
Philip if I had an envelope with the key in it I would try and learn some clandestine skills to open it without looking like it had been tampered with.
this is risky, but within the realm of possibility. i think the best thing is if only the key holder knows the combination and then sends it as a message or something similar.
i don't have much confidence in technology. a pure combination lock would be mechanical, which is much more trustworthy in my opinion.
Angelina i don't have much confidence in technology. a pure combination lock would be mechanical, which is much more trustworthy in my opinion.
Mechanics can jam even more easily than electronics can glitch. As long as you have a way to make it not rely on a stable power supply for safety (unlockable) and security (irremovable without proper unlocking), I would prefer the electronics.