Vanessa I disagree with almost all this post(and it's often the case with your posts),so I won't waste time explaining it to you again,we've already had similar discussions,and we should accept we'll never agree.In my case,I've accepted it.So it's a waste of time for you too, to try to convince me you're right(and even more when you're close to be agressive,like in this post).You should accept we'll never agree,too.
Hi my little frenchie. Glad to finally hear from you.
Your message is not very pleasant to read for me but it had less the merit to renew the dialogue. I understand that you may be angry at me for some of the positions you do not share.
I understood that for you I was only a vulgar Martian Troll who understands nothing for nothing and who allows himself to judge the life of others without really knowing it. And I do not blame you for thinking of me because you obviously have the right not to condone all that I write.
I understand that I can have a stripper side that can not please everyone. But my goal is for some of my messages to hit your minds by making you think differently than you've been taught to do.
But beside this aspect that you consider as negative you could also recognize me some of my qualities as the dedication, the respect of the woman, the sincerity of the advice that I am called to lavish with a view to try to appease your moral suffering .
As I have already explained to you, my liberal philosophy can not admit that we can deprive a girl of one of her most basic rights.
I consider the right to sexual fulfillment (especially for girls) as something sacred. It is therefore inconceivable to me that a human being can arrogate to himself the right to impose on any other human being the slightest restriction on sexuality.
I consider it even criminal to do so because one does not have the right to encroach on the privacy of others. Is this something so inconceivable for you?
I have the intimate conviction that the more people make love, the softer their characters and the more social tensions demine. To think that sexuality has only been given to human beings to reproduce is nonsense. Sexuality is something very profound and very rewarding for humanity, especially when it is exercised with deep respect for one's partner.
Otherwise I too must confess that I am angry at you because, under the pretext that you did not appreciate one of my demonstrations you have not bothered to answer me directly for almost a month. (including on humorous topics that were not subject to controversy)
Even when I offered you some idea you don't have the courtesy to reward me with a small "thanks" (eg the anaphrodisaques products to try to limit the suffering of your brother when is locked in the cage)
And I find it really regrettable that I had to tackle you in one of my posts for you finally decide to address you again to me. You blame me for being aggressive, but do not you think he's a little bit searching?
Indeed under the pretext of ignoring me you have allowed yourself to express negative opinions on the content of some of my messages while taking care to address you to all others except me (the first concerned).
And if you be teased this way, it was to encourage to be in perfect coherence with yourself: if you decide to ignore me because you consider that I write only bullshit and well I ask you to also ignore all the crap I write.
Even if I am angry after you, I nevertheless became convinced that you were a very good girl and not at all selfish.
Indeed I remember reading one of your messages in which you explained that despite the injustice that you suffered in terms of sexual freedom from your brother you forbid to talk to your parents because you thought there was more chance your brother's sexual freedom might be restricted rather than yours increased.
At first I suspected that you could be jealous and resentful of this blatant family injustice. In spite of that you made the choice to preserve the freedom of your twin brother and I sincerely wanted to congratulate you for having done so.
Otherwise, what hurts the most is that you can think of me as an enemy when I am truly saddened by the moral suffering that is eating you up almost every night.
Even if I do not know you personally, the fact of knowing that you can cry at the bottom of your bed is far from leaving me unmoved. Apart from the fact that you were born a female, you did not do anything wrong to deserve to suffer such suffering. And it saddens me that you have to endure this type of pain in a purely gratuitous way. Your torment is useless and it will never make anyone happy
Starting from the observation that we do not have the same definition of the word LOVE we must accept that we will never agree on this point. But if we have the intelligence to disregard this profound divergence, we could probably benefit from the other aspects of our respective personalities.
I think that @Angélina has managed to sort out between what I am able to bring positive but without endorsing all of my interventions that can sometimes shock. She perfectly understood that I could never be the enemy of a belted woman because in my mind a belted girl will always be an innocent victim.
