Spork What would the courts enforce?
it would depend on whether it was medically ethically correct. the comparison to a private chastity belt contract, however, is very far-fetched in my opinion
Spork That's kind of my point. A lot of the posts in this thread are conflating morality and legality, and assuming that because something is immoral according to their viewpoint, it must be clearly and definitively illegal.
do we agree that it is illegal to put someone in a chastity belt against their will? If so, then the contract would automatically be illegal from the point at which a court has to deal with the review of the contract at all, because at that point the person is definitely wearing the belt against his/her will
youdontknowme Might be the high role that freedom of speech plays in your version of human and civil rights that makes it difficult to legislate (and enforce laws) against verbal threats,
which is also reasonable, an opinion is not a crime
Spork in that it is legal to escape prison there.
of course it's legal, it's just almost impossible to do it without committing other crimes 😂