Foxies Though I have no wish to offend however, I would encourage others to think about the ethics surrounding the reluctant/unwilling wearing of devices that cannot be removed by the wearer without access to keys etc. It doesn’t matter what these devices are. Ethically, it is about how the wearer is being pressured into being locked into something that decreases their quality of life and that they can no longer remove.
I'm not totally in this case.I'm a reluctant wearer,but 25 years old,and I can stop it when I want(not without consequences,however).
Foxies only hope that this doesn’t devolve into the usual half or one sentence replies of trivial chat.
In my case,I don't have much time to answer it much more,sorry...
Max9 I think it's important that we don't support anyone who wants to belt soneone against ones will, but when someone agrees to being belted oneself ... with relucant wearing it's the problem that people are pushed into accepting the belt.
Generally,I think everyone here agree and are against forced wearing.
This includes in my opinion,threatening to have to leave/breaking the relationship with the family if not accepting,etc...
Not sure how to consider having more privileges,like a later curfew,a own car,etc...if accepting(as long as not accepting doesn't mean almost no freedom).It can be considered more as an agreement,maybe.
Not necessarily.No problem with writing a long text here.
Ines I think everyone that tell this is a troll
Why?For some privileges,like a later curfew,it seems related...
Foxies Thus I am afraid while ever the forum administrators permit me, I shall continue to post my occasional thoughts and I won't care about how long (or short) they might be.
As I said,no problem if you write long posts!🙂
