youdontknowme preventing and enhancing pleasure are not mutually exclusive
Right. But in @Jen 's case she has a serious purpose. The definition, methinks, must go to the user's purpose, not what kind of belt one has.
youdontknowme preventing and enhancing pleasure are not mutually exclusive
Right. But in @Jen 's case she has a serious purpose. The definition, methinks, must go to the user's purpose, not what kind of belt one has.
Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.
that sounds good, i think i would be very happy with the definition
this can happen automatically, of course, but i think the important thing for the classification is the purpose with which the wearer wants to wear the belt.
Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.
Something I'd like to add. My first belt was one I borrowed from my mother, who used it as a toy while fooling around with my Dad. I then used it as a serious device to protect me after I was assaulted. So the same belt served two purposes, one recreational and one serious.
Whether it is a toy is a matter of philosophical consideration and does not change anything about the state of the belt. So where is the problem?
Avery They kept the belt in the toy drawer in their room with the French maid costume and the flogger.
Haha! I like your parents.
Ines Absolutely offtopic, but maid is a very cool costume, it is very feminine, similar to, even if I am studying medicine, the nurses.
Doctors have fame of being serious, nurses however fame of being sweeter.
Let's revive the plaster topic, that was kinda hot.