Cheating a belt
Jen That is the thing. When you have an unrestricted quantity of sexual pleasure, the quality suffers as a result, so preventing and enhancing pleasure are not mutually exclusive.
youdontknowme preventing and enhancing pleasure are not mutually exclusive
Right. But in @Jen 's case she has a serious purpose. The definition, methinks, must go to the user's purpose, not what kind of belt one has.
Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.
that sounds good, i think i would be very happy with the definition
this can happen automatically, of course, but i think the important thing for the classification is the purpose with which the wearer wants to wear the belt.
Avery I'll take a stab at that. If the belt is intended to prevent sexual pleasure it's serious use, if it's intended to enhance sexual pleasure it's a toy.
Something I'd like to add. My first belt was one I borrowed from my mother, who used it as a toy while fooling around with my Dad. I then used it as a serious device to protect me after I was assaulted. So the same belt served two purposes, one recreational and one serious.
- Edited
Whether it is a toy is a matter of philosophical consideration and does not change anything about the state of the belt. So where is the problem?
- Edited
Avery They kept the belt in the toy drawer in their room with the French maid costume and the flogger.
Haha! I like your parents.
Ines Absolutely offtopic, but maid is a very cool costume, it is very feminine, similar to, even if I am studying medicine, the nurses.
Doctors have fame of being serious, nurses however fame of being sweeter.
Let's revive the plaster topic, that was kinda hot.