I had an incident at work a week or so ago where I caught a glimpse of my boss’s, boss’s, boss’s wife in a state of partial undress. She was wearing loose-fitting slacks without a belt (the kind that holds up one’s trousers).
The slacks were riding very low in the back, and I could see that she wasn’t wearing underwear.
She was not wearing a chastity belt, but it would have been really cool if she had been.
The owners are foreign-born, from India or Nepal, and relatively wealthy, so the idea of a chastity belt would not have seemed completely out of the question.
This incident actually recalls a similar incident that happened in 1985 when I was a customer of the White Castle fast-food joint in Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey, just a stone’s throw from NYC.
There was a female customer wearing some kind of one-piece romper or shortalls-type garment, which was made of yellow linen or cheesecloth. The transparency of the fabric was such that you could easily see her underwear.
I thought it would have been way cool if she had been wearing a chastity belt, preferably one of the Centurian’s all-leather “horse harness” belts, the kind with a 3”-wide waist belt and 3”-wide thigh straps. While I have generally considered these belts to be somewhat gauche, vulgar, and unattractive, in this context it would have been perfect.
And I would really like to know where the young lady got the romper/shortalls outfit; all of my recent internet/eBay/Etsy searches have come up empty.
