Saintprudence So not only are you prevented from slutty behavior, but sinful self-touch
And she does it carefully.
Angelina but it's not immediately noticeable, right?
Yes, it looks solid.
Intro
Renita And she does it carefully
Good! I’m sure you are grateful for such diligent supervision.
Saintprudence I’m sure you are grateful for such diligent supervision
She didn't give me any chance for things I could regret later 
Renita She didn't give me any chance for things I could regret later
See? Your attitude is perfect!
Saintprudence Your attitude is perfect
Chastity belt was my choice.
Renita yes, but as I recall, the permanence of the belting was not. Didn’t she confiscate the keys when she learned you were belted, and then impose a stricter regimen than you would have chosen for yourself? Or am I thinking of Ines here?
Saintprudence Didn’t she confiscate the keys when she learned you were belted, and then impose a stricter regimen than you would have chosen for yourself?
Yes, she did. But for the secondary shield only.
Renita that was wise. No belt wearer should have the ability to remove the shield. And if you’re belted, you have no business going without the shield anyway. The only purpose of the shield is to prevent touch you shouldn’t be doing to begin with!
Saintprudence No belt wearer should have the ability to remove the shield
I was going to use it for labia protection only.
Saintprudence And if you’re belted, you have no business going without the shield anyway.
Still no sex even without the shield.
Renita but equally importantly, no self-stimulation as long as the shield is in place!
Saintprudence No belt wearer should have the ability to remove the shield. And if you’re belted, you have no business going without the shield anyway.
Based on my own experience you do need to wear a secondary shield even if it's detachable.
HHelen correct. The shield serves a protective purpose for the skin, even beyond the essential anti-masturbation function.
@Saintprudence @HHelen @Renita Everyone makes a big to do on and on and on about the 2nd shield as though it were a plot against women but the truth is it is needed to stay comfortable.
It would be absolutely terrible to have the old museum pieces that cut and chafe
I have never really masturbated very much even since marriage but I suspect that my belts with shields would not be pleasant to masturbate around. I think it would be more of a discomfort than anything.
Megan if anything, the fact that secondary shields serve a useful and justifiable comfort purpose any belted woman would welcome (preventing cutting and chafing) while also serving a useful virtue purpose the wearers might object to (completely ending hope of masturbation while belted) is a very convenient bank shot!
Renita Yes, it looks solid.
then you will have less problems talking openly about it with a potential partner in the future, won't you? 
HHelen Based on my own experience you do need to wear a secondary shield even if it's detachable.
apart from the safety aspects, about which we probably have different opinions, the secondary shield is also important for wearing comfort, so that nothing gets squeezed.
Megan Everyone makes a big to do on and on and on about the 2nd shield as though it were a plot against women but the truth is it is needed to stay comfortable.
i agree, when reading this thread i had similar thoughts 
if it were up to me, i might masturbate without the secondary shield, but put it back on afterwards because it's too uncomfortable otherwise.
- Edited
Saintprudence no self-stimulation as long as the shield is in place
But it was not my goal.
Megan but the truth is it is needed to stay comfortable
I knew it, and that was my intent.
Megan I have never really masturbated very much even since marriage
Do you have a key for your secondary shield?
Angelina then you will have less problems talking openly about it with a potential partner in the future,
Yes, I think it will be easier.
5 days later