- Edited
youdontknowme I think the implication was that the woman's body shape would serve as a substitude for the chastity belt, that no man would want to have sex with her so she is inherently safe from any unwanted activity. Which seems downright insulting.
Yes, I understood that, too.
youdontknowme And yeah, "abolutely every woman should wear" sounds like a somewhat warped world view. Make that "should have the opportunity to wear" and we can agree on that, but the women who want to be in charge of their own sexuality should have that right.
Well, it is my opinion. Anyway, it is different "should" of "have".
Every girl is free for wear or do not wear, but however even if the girls that do not wear it, should wear it.