Single again chastity

Angelina or neither of them but you want to get almost everyone into the belt at the moment anyway

Haha, true enough! Goody and I will both be belted at the end of this if I have my way, though we will both also be assured of sexual fulfillment.

Angelina i would doubt that and that is exactly why the chastity belt is out of the question for me as an educational tool, i think it is important to prevent excessive masturbation, but that is only possible if we allow a normal way of dealing with sexuality and can explain excess.

I do agree with you here, which is why I specified it was a school of thought and not MY school of thought. I was raised by 70s/80s deeply Catholic parents, and there was a hysterical fear among that community of kids even learning what sex WAS and a lot of frankly psychotic obsession with being sure nobody was self-touching. 70s Catholics are close to Victorians in their zeal for preventing masturbation no matter what.

Saintprudence Haha, true enough! Goody and I will both be belted at the end of this if I have my way, though we will both also be assured of sexual fulfillment.

I am really very curious to see how the whole thing will turn out for you.

Saintprudence

yes, i understand the problem. especially in the 70s and 80s, many people were still extremely conservative and the church unfortunately also played a very unfortunate role there.

Saintprudence Protect you from the urges that the belt prevents you from acting on.

But I don't need such protection.

Angelina you have to ask your mother, but it should always be meant as protection of ....whatever

No, it's obvious what this protection is from, that's why it looks more like fetish.

Christine No, it's obvious what this protection is from, that's why it looks more like fetish.

but if it's a fetish, it's not protection. In my opinion, both at the same time do not work in a mother-daughter relationship

Angelina but if it's a fetish, it's not protection

This "protection" is her fetish itself. Protection without a reason, just want me to be "protected".

Christine so she’s not religious or sexually conservative or anything, she just kind of randomly wants you not to have access to yourself? That does sound suspicious, especially if she does not apply such rules to herself.

Christine This "protection" is her fetish itself. Protection without a reason, just want me to be "protected".

so she has a fetish to protect you? doesn't sound good at all, i think she is something called a "helicopter parent". i hope she soon realises that useless protection is no protection, maybe she needs also a therapy.

Christine Protection without a reason

She wants to prevent sex, because you are single. That's the reason.

Angelina so she has a fetish to protect you?

I don't think it's a fetish at all.

Angelina that useless protection is no protection

It doesn't seem useless.

Renita She wants to prevent sex, because you are single. That's the reason.

Everyone has different thoughts, and @Christine has different standards with you. For you it may be protection but for her it isn't. While you are willingly wearing it but @Christine isn't. that's a big difference there.

Renita She wants to prevent sex, because you are single. That's the reason.

Although I have my doubts about the motivations, Christine’s attitude about it is precisely why the belt must be locked with no access to the keys in the first place!

Angelina I think @Christine can judge that better

She just doesn't want to wear a belt

Renita nor would she, given how clearly she wants what the belt denies!

Saintprudence That does sound suspicious, especially if she does not apply such rules to herself.

Ofc, she wants to be a keyholder rather than a wearer.

Angelina so she has a fetish to protect you?

Something like this.

Renita She wants to prevent sex, because you are single.

Her point. And not everybody agrees with it.

Christine
From my little experience at home, I believe that, in general, there is no reason why a woman who is a "keyholder" of another should not wear a belt in her turn.
I regret having taken a few months to realize it, but now I am clear that "if it's good for one, it's good for all".

Renita She just doesn't want to wear a belt

and that surprises you? even of the involuntary ones, @Christine seems to be very unwilling, which I can understand, though.

Rafael "if it's good for one, it's good for all".

in this case i agree with you. @Christine, your mother is single too, isn't she? Then the belt would be just as appropriate for her as for you, according to your mother's logic, wouldn't it?

Angelina and that surprises you?

No, but her explanation.

Renita No, but her explanation.

even if it is sometimes presented differently in the forum, the reasons for a belt should always be explained and not those against a belt. a chastity belt is not the normal state of affairs.

Rafael there is no reason why a woman who is a "keyholder" of another should not wear a belt in her turn.

Me too. But she declines it.

Angelina @Christine, your mother is single too, isn't she?

Yes.

Angelina Then the belt would be just as appropriate for her as for you, according to your mother's logic, wouldn't it?

She uses her age as an excuse, hence nothing to protect.

Christine She uses her age as an excuse, hence nothing to protect.

But age is not a reason, at most virginity, which you no longer have either.