Saintprudence That's the paradox thing ablut chastity. The belt thats aimed to prevent you doing things but it also makes you want to do such things in first place. Of course, you can also want to do those things by nature, eventually, that's tge only way it actually makes sense as a tool for prevention.
The question is if growing up belted actually steals you the chance to learn a responsitive way to deal with those things.
Max9 certainly, growing up in a religious “chastity belt” constructed from guilt and indoctrination did not help me with learning responsible use of self-pleasure.
Max9 The question is if growing up belted actually steals you the chance to learn a responsitive way to deal with those things
I doubt it. I think, having sex is a normal human thing and everybody knows how to do it. And if you don't know how it feels to masturbate, then you don't miss it. Thats my sight, maybe I'm wrong, maybe not 
Kris This is why one chastity belt school of thought holds that one masturbation is too many, and two or more should be prevented at all costs.
Saintprudence Kris This is why one chastity belt school of thought holds that one masturbation is too many, and two or more should be prevented at all costs
Sorry I didn't understood that. Can you please explain? 
Kris Mostly I’m just repeating your statement. According to this line of thought, the best way to prevent excessive masturbation is to keep it from happening even once, so the subject doesn’t know how good it feels. And if they do get to experience it, once you put the belt on, you have to diligently prevent cheating, closely supervise breaks, and never allow “freebie” masturbation sessions. Otherwise, the belted individual could get addicted to the touch.
Saintprudence So it’s only logical that both bear the consequences of the belt!
or neither of them 
but you want to get almost everyone into the belt at the moment anyway 
Renita I think virginity is not a first argument anyway.
at least for my father it is
Christine Sorry, protect from what?
you have to ask your mother, but it should always be meant as protection of ....whatever
Saintprudence According to this line of thought, the best way to prevent excessive masturbation is to keep it from happening even once,
i would doubt that and that is exactly why the chastity belt is out of the question for me as an educational tool, i think it is important to prevent excessive masturbation, but that is only possible if we allow a normal way of dealing with sexuality and can explain excess.
Angelina or neither of them
Haha, true enough! Goody and I will both be belted at the end of this if I have my way, though we will both also be assured of sexual fulfillment.
Angelina i would doubt that and that is exactly why the chastity belt is out of the question for me as an educational tool, i think it is important to prevent excessive masturbation, but that is only possible if we allow a normal way of dealing with sexuality and can explain excess.
I do agree with you here, which is why I specified it was a school of thought and not MY school of thought. I was raised by 70s/80s deeply Catholic parents, and there was a hysterical fear among that community of kids even learning what sex WAS and a lot of frankly psychotic obsession with being sure nobody was self-touching. 70s Catholics are close to Victorians in their zeal for preventing masturbation no matter what.
Saintprudence Haha, true enough! Goody and I will both be belted at the end of this if I have my way, though we will both also be assured of sexual fulfillment.
I am really very curious to see how the whole thing will turn out for you.
yes, i understand the problem. especially in the 70s and 80s, many people were still extremely conservative and the church unfortunately also played a very unfortunate role there.
Saintprudence Protect you from the urges that the belt prevents you from acting on.
But I don't need such protection.
Angelina you have to ask your mother, but it should always be meant as protection of ....whatever
No, it's obvious what this protection is from, that's why it looks more like fetish.
Angelina but if it's a fetish, it's not protection
This "protection" is her fetish itself. Protection without a reason, just want me to be "protected".
Christine so she’s not religious or sexually conservative or anything, she just kind of randomly wants you not to have access to yourself? That does sound suspicious, especially if she does not apply such rules to herself.
Christine This "protection" is her fetish itself. Protection without a reason, just want me to be "protected".
so she has a fetish to protect you? doesn't sound good at all, i think she is something called a "helicopter parent". i hope she soon realises that useless protection is no protection, maybe she needs also a therapy.
Renita She wants to prevent sex, because you are single. That's the reason.
Everyone has different thoughts, and @Christine has different standards with you. For you it may be protection but for her it isn't. While you are willingly wearing it but @Christine isn't. that's a big difference there.
Renita She wants to prevent sex, because you are single. That's the reason.
Although I have my doubts about the motivations, Christine’s attitude about it is precisely why the belt must be locked with no access to the keys in the first place!
Renita I don't think it's a fetish at all.
I think @Christine can judge that better
Renita It doesn't seem useless.
from your point of view, but you have a different view on the subject of chastity than @Christine.
Rina For you it may be protection but for her it isn't.
right, and since i wear one myself involuntarily, i see it that way too. by protection, i mean more from the point of view of the key holder.
