Angelina Of course it was, that's the reason why I joined this forum back then so that I could talk about my problems without sexualization

I disagree. Something that prevent sex is sexual in nature. It's like asking to speak of atheism pretending to avoid religion. Chastity belts are meant to prevent sexual acts. Of course is sex. see masturbation topic. In no other sexual forum there is so talking about masturbation than this.
If chastity belt was meant as a medical device, than you can ask for neutrality, but an item whose purpose is to prevent the wearer from doing sex is definitely sexual, and minors should stay away.

    Milord Can also argue that preventing what I was engaged in in this way, while unconventional would have been in my best interest.
    Not saying it’s right, but there’s always multiple interpretations

      Sasha
      I'm sorry but I can't understand how your words are tied to chastity belt and sexualization. Can you help me?

        Milord Yes it would be tied to my sexuality, what I’m saying is that if I’d be pushed in that direction it could be seen as positive.
        Again, just playing devils advocate it’s never ok to force it

          Sasha
          I like to be challenged. Still you have to admit that your case is unique, and hardly can be a lawful base to create a policy. It's too personal.

            Angelina Unfortunately I can't answer your other arguments because I don't know what CSA means?

            Already explained it above.

            Angelina unfortunately my hands are tied

            I was about to make a joke out of that, but between your past experiences and the fact that minors are actively present in this thread, better not.

            Milord your case is unique, and hardly can be a lawful base to create a policy

            Maybe we really need Prudence's chastity court. Wonder if Sasha would be interested in submitting her case, or if that fake court is too silly for someone who has spent a lot of time in real court for reasons that also involve her belt.

              Milord I would say when another person controls whether you can have sex, there is a sexual component in that. Not sure that is a dealbreaker for platonic and familial keyholding, but it is a complication those dynamics have to handle.

                youdontknowme you can see it in this forum. See how many posts there are about masturbation. Not even in a sex forum there is this amount of conversation on this topic. But it's normal, it's not an anomaly at all. I can totally understand. Just let's avoid thinking that the whole chastity belting is not about sexuality.

                  I think since the CB restricts the free development of sexuality, it is never neutral.

                  Milord

                  I don't know, I've seen it on teen forums that are arguably more policed than here. People really started wilding when it first got published in Teen Vogue. Now it's mentioned in practically every issue.

                  Milord

                  i don't want to be misunderstood, of course a chastity belt is a sexual device, the belt is sexual. i mean that the wearer of the belt is not sexualised, that was something that worked better in the past

                  youdontknowme I was about to make a joke out of that, but between your past experiences and the fact that minors are actively present in this thread, better not.

                  it was just a saying. short explanation for everyone, i can't help without breaking the rules of the forum (that frustrates me)

                  Milord Just let's avoid thinking that the whole chastity belting is not about sexuality.

                  of course this forum is also primarily about sexuality, but you can discuss things like a sexual fantasy or you can discuss what is factual

                  • Joh replied to this.

                    Angelina i don't want to be misunderstood, of course a chastity belt is a sexual device, the belt is sexual. i mean that the wearer of the belt is not sexualised, that was something that worked better in the past

                    Because, as you confirm, it has a sexual aspect and so it can't never be neutral.
                    When people keep trying to differentiate between serious and kinky use and thereby distance themselves, I think that's just window dressing. Ultimately, it's in the eye of the beholder what it is for him.

                      Joh Ultimately, it's in the eye of the beholder what it is for him.

                      right and that's exactly why i disagree and say that there are these differences and the forum used to have clear positions that we are talking about serious use here

                      I want to state, that I totally appreciate @Ines and @Laura efforts to remove underage topics. Those topics are why am not around here as much as I would like. I think there are valuable discussions here; however, the underage topics definately hold me back. Plus those topics have gained this fourm a rather bad reputation in many on-line communities.

                        JonesMacGyver

                        Thanks Jones. However those conversations do not exist here since a long time ago, and everyday I try to find old inadequate posts and erase them.
                        I have to say that part of bad fame comes for lies that even currently are spread in some servers, (I joined some of them to be aware), when this forum does not have bad content.
                        A problem for that people , however we had not proper topics, is that they are pervs and this community is about other belt usage, and it seems annoy them.

                          now that i have been able to read the original post, i would like to give some advice. @Tabletop.
                          you can certainly tell your friend what's going on with you, but be careful and make them promise to keep it between you and only do it if you have a high level of trust