curious Maybe ultimately you would win arguing freedom of speech,
i would rather say the moderator would win because he can't be held responsible because he has no rights to the forum, this is the sole responsibility of the owner. a moderator is not responsible to the outside world but only has to work internally to enforce the rules of the forum. to be clear, if illegal content is posted a moderator can't be held responsible if it would be allowed under the rules of the forum
curious He would have significant legal exposure as moderator, so that warning stands.
but we are not a german forum, so the legal situation in germany is irrelevant
Joh @Laue and I would first have to talk about her expectations and my tasks with framework conditions. If we come to a common denominator, I would be willing to do it.
@Laura what do you think? in the end you have to decide
curious Not protecting your wifi against abuse leads to being held resonsonsible for what other people do with it.
ok, now i want to see proof of that. then theoretically it would be possible that i, as the owner of our wifi, would be responsible if my wife did illegal things on the internet?