Chastity belt rescue

Ines
Hello Ines
I beg you to forgive my ignorance about the design of the chastity devices that you are all called upon to wear. Having never had any contact with this type of "product" that I would call "disconcerting" I apologize for writing a mistake.
In fact, if I suggested this idea it was because I thought I understood that Vanessa had managed to introduce small objects into her shield without achieving the desired effect. And I deduced that the vibration of the shield would be ineffective if there was no contact reinforced by the zone of pleasure.
Otherwise it is true that your opinion is unique since you seem to be the only one to accept the principle of restricting your sexual freedom. Moreover, the fact that your younger sister may still be free of her actions proves that there is a certain family consensus on the subject. In your family your parents encourage you to master sex-ually but without forcing you by force or blackmail.
If I can afford a comparison: it's a bit like encouraging teens to wear braces so they can have perfect teeth in adult-hood. In the beginning, the dental appliance provokes a physical and aesthetic dis-satisfaction but it will generate an advantage for the adult. Does my example of the dental appliance go in the direction of your conception compared to the idea that you have chastity?
In other words, I respect your opinion because you are intimately convinced of ob-taining a superior blessing once married. In a way you seem to make it a point of honor to master you sexually and I can only congratulate you to impose such disci-pline on your future husband. I hope he will consider you a princess and behave like a prince charming to you. Moreover “Ines” rhymes with “princess”.

On the other hand I am deeply upset and revolted by the story of girls who are locked against their will. I consider it an unpardonable male oppression that can have serious psychological consequences on girls many years later. In addition I recently discovered that some of them were also physically punished just for the principle every Sunday. Their story so upset me that I would have preferred never to discover this forum and remain in a certain naivety in thinking that this type of situation did not exist. Now that I know I am deeply uncomfortable with this distress. And I unders-tood that on this point our opinion was convergent. Am I right to think so?

If not in relation to your situation, I would like you to shed light on two questions:

Could your younger sister be punished if she was caught masturbating where does she have total freedom until she decided to wear the belt?

As you seem to be firmly convinced that you should not masturbate, could not you just swear to your parents not to do it?
And in case of breach of your commitment you agree to submit to a regime more stringent than the one you currently have for a certain period defined in advance. I think this type of consensus would be less infantilizing and would save you a lot of hygienic and physical constraints. Moreover you would feel valued on the moral plane since you would be able to master yourself. It would not be the metal that would dictate your behavior but only your sincere desire to honor your parents. If I take again the example of the dental apparatus: you could obtain an impeccable den-tition by making the commitment not to suck your thumb during your childhood. Do you like my demo?

Ines
Attention the other Mac Gyver to yet another idea:

1. Twist the handle one tablespoon.

2. Grasp the spoon upside down.

3. Slide the spoon handle from the back of the belt through the shield until you reach the fun zone.

4A. Stimulate the pleasure zone by the movement of the spoon or by moving your hips.

4B. Or Using a vibrator transmit vibrations to the spoon as soon as it is well positioned in the shield.

Ines

Ines I must admit that your questioning on "In pursuit of Red October" calls me. You want to talk about the movie with Sean CONNERY in the role of Commander Marco RAMIUS. It is a very difficult film to understand in the course of the actions but that I very much appreciated. I particularly liked the relationship between the commander and his second Vasily (from memory). Indeed, even if he disapproved of a decision of the commander he never contradicted him "never" in front of the crew. He gave Captain Ramuis an unfailing devotion. You see this movie speaks to me.
Moreover, at this moment in France we have a campaign for the prevention of breast cancer called "Pink October" the goal is to encourage women over 50 years to make mammograms to ensure that everything good for her. So it's a strange coincidence that you're talking about this movie because I've been thinking about it recently. I am amazed by this coincidence of circumstance.
Otherwise my two favorite films are "Titanic" (1998) and "2-22" (2017) which must be called "premonition" in Spanish. I think you should enjoy this movie (There's a protective man) so I'll link you to the trailer link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D95U1t5VQys

Vanessa
Hi Vanessa, In fact, if I addressed Laura "indirectly" it was as the patron of the publication because I thought she was going to move the posts as soon as they moved away from the original topic of discussion (which I called the "depolution")
And I thought my messages about the relief proposals were going to be the subject of a disjointed discussion with too explicit a title.
So while responding to Tere I took the opportunity to attract the attention of Laura (as forum manager) on this point. I prefer to be cautious about potential parents who might someday attend the forum. In this respect it would be possible to create a function MP (private message).
That is to say the possibility of exchanging between members without the others being able to have knowledge of it. It would be much safer for you because even if your parents are not officially registered on this forum, nothing would prevent them from having one day or another access to all of your stories as a "free reader".
"Safety before the comfort of chatting" it reminds me of something similar (lol)
Otherwise I did understand that Ines was the daughter of Tere.

In fact to avoid confusion I should have spoken directly to Laura about the management of messages. I hope you understand my explanation for this point.
I would like to help you as best I can by finding a tip that can do you good.
That said, I have a huge gap in the making of belts. If only I had a real model at home I could check my theories more concretely and it would avoid that I propose crap solutions.
And yet I dig my brains carefully examining all the objects around me. The ideal would be to have a belted manikin with electronic sensor. As soon as I get to the pleasure zone, a green light will flash over his head. A bit like in the board game "Doctor Maboul" (lol) I do not know if you visualize the scene.

I think the weak point of your equipment is from the back. According to you is it possible to slide a small flat metal ruler by the back and back in the shield ?
https://www.amazon.fr/%C3%A9cole-m%C3%A9tallique-r%C3%A8gle-Dessin-mesurer/dp/B0143XVX14
If so could you tell me about the width and height not to be exceeded by trying to slide thicker objects under your shield. (without getting caught) Otherwise if you want to try the ribbon technique I think you could get a better performance with a winder of this style: https://www.manomano.fr/p/metre-ruban-3m-x-127mm-en-tylon-6427316?model_id=1713506
It will just be necessary that you break the small metallic end-piece located towards zero in order to be able to slide it under the shield.
Its reverse side (without the numbers is slightly curved) and could by its rigidity provide a nice little tactile touch on the clitoris; (Well, I say, but I'm not a girl) So it's not easy for me to deter-mine what can do you good.
But I hope that by playing with your pelvis you will finally be able to make you happy.
Pray for that to work.