BikelockFugitive It's not about keeping her a virgin or something like that, its basically just psychological warfare to better the daughter.
In a way, I get a little understanding of your point of view.
But do not you think that the psychological fight could be more easily won by depriving the unmanageable teenager of his mobile phone?
For my part I will see many advantages:
To Save 800 € if anger the girl had to break his belt.
Prevent parents from being summoned to police for minor child abuse. (the belt could only make things worse)
To prevent the child from experiencing psychological problems as a result of the repression of his sexuality.
Indeed, it has been shown that suppression of sexual desire in a teenager causes behavioral problems in adulthood and it is no accident that the majority of sex offenders have been oppressed sexually by their parents during their teenage years.
- Lastly, this would make it possible to avoid entering a logic of persecution from generation to generation.
Indeed, it has also been argued that people who were oppressed during their childhood had a tendency to behave as oppressors when they became adults.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I honestly think that most of the girls in the forum would be more comfortable wearing a belt for two weeks rather than being deprived of cell phones during that time.
But for a punishment more longer (over a month), I think that their choice would be reversed.
Finally it's just a guess and they will not delay to give us their opinion.
I can not wait to know. Not you ?