Angelina I don't really understand your point of view.
a chastity belt is to put it bluntly a prison for the vagina, it would be the same reasoning for you to say that we imprison any person for a certain time in a prison without that person having committed a crime just because it could be that that person is becoming a criminal
in my opinion not logical
It's my pleasure to see you thinking like me. π
I feel that your message could have been written by me π
Do not worry, I will not ask you for copyright for that. π€£
...
If you assume that the girl scrupulously respects the instructions of these parents (no sex before marriage) you logically conclude that the wearing of the belt would be useless and unfair since it would generate unnecessary stress for her.
For your part, if the young woman is docile and obedient, it would be useless to be forced her to wear such a thing as long as she wishes to respect the values ββof her parents.
It is therefore logical that you consider that the fact of imposing the wearing of the belt would be to put in prison for a crime that is suspected to commit.
For you it is totally illogical and incoherent to coerce a girl who wants to stay chaste. Your reasoning is therefore quite right.
...
But Ines and Laura do not consider the belt as a tool of repression (to be used to punish unauthorized behavior) but rather as a tool of prevention (aimed at preventing the girl from committing a fault).
In their reasoning, they assume that the girl's willingness to remain chaste will be very difficult to respect because of sexual drive and desire. They therefore suppose that the belt is a protection that will allow the girl not to succumb to the temptation of pleasure.
This is why you can not agree on this because you do not perceive the wearing of the belt in the same way.
Moreover Ines being a carrier "voluntary" and you carrier "constraint" that necessarily strengthens the divergence of view.
And for her part Laura has a "safety valve" with the ability to masturbate. So she can therefore consider personally feel that wearing her "abstinence" belt as a "reasonable restriction".
It is obvious that for Laura her stay "in prison" is much bearable for her than for you since she is entitled to "leave permissions".
The fact that you are "forced" and assigned to "absolute chastity" necessarily makes you much more rebellious against the belt than Ines or Laura. It's quite logical since you do not have the same wearing regime.