Reasons for chastity

reactionary69

Laura Are you becoming @Renita 2.0? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Laura

Renita

reactionary69 Do you think all my posts must be marked as "Humor"?

strictfather

I saw many times on this forum you wrote <<i was caught [masturbating] by my parents [so they bought a chastity belt / they tought their CB decision was right / ...]"

A question: how is it possible you was "caught"? unless you where masturbating in the middle of dining room or in your room having door open or so on.... how could your parent "catch" you doing it?

It would be impossible if you do it in your bed when all are gone to bed, in silence, be carefull no one gets up and walk around in the house,... or if you do it only when you are alone in the house....

so... why, where and by who have you been caught?

Angelina

strictfather

I was a little careless 🙁

i put myself in my bed and masturbated on the day, my father opened the door and caught me 🙁

quite simply explained 😉

Laura

strictfather You don't need to be caught explicitly 😃

Vanessa

Angelina

Except the threat,were you punished for it?If yes,how?

strictfather

I was more than once caught red-handed,I sometimes had a strong need during the day,and tried to relieve it quickly,in my room,and my parents opened the door unexpectedly(I was not allowed to lock it).I agree it was not very careful,but I often tended to relieve my urges quickly when I was free...And I was able to do it without being caught more often than trying to do it and caught.

I was punished too if there is "marks of masturbation/sex"(stains...),especially on the sheets.It was considered as a proof that I disobeyed.

Angelina

Pretty classical way to be caught when masturbating...

Was it forbidden for you to lock your door,too?

Laura

Do you think about stains,too?

Esteban

strictfather I saw many times on this forum you wrote <<i was caught [masturbating] by my parents [so they bought a chastity belt / they tought their CB decision was right / ...]"
A question: how is it possible you was "caught"? unless you where masturbating in the middle of dining room or in your room having door open or so on.... how could your parent "catch" you doing it?

It would be impossible if you do it in your bed when all are gone to bed, in silence, be carefull no one gets up and walk around in the house,... or if you do it only when you are alone in the house....
so... why, where and by who have you been caught?

I'm glad you asked that question because it's because it teased me for a while. I thought the same thing that you. Why are girls so imprudent with the punishments they incur?

It is certain that with the prohibition to lock the door of their room, the risk was much more important to they. In addition, if the parents make a fixation on this, they must necessarily be on the lookout for any suspicious moaning or any physical trace of the offense.

So now I understand why these poor unfortunates got caught like this. They were not in the same conditions as in a lambda family.

And that makes me feel bad for them because not only is there the punishment, but there is also the deep feeling of shame and guilt of being a kind of "bad girl" in the eyes of his parents.

Already being caught in a liberal family can make both people feel very uncomfortable.
I conclude that it must be even worse for them to get caught while it was formally forbidden. So much so that for girls it must have been a terribly difficult to deal with psychologically. And their "self-esteem" must have been deeply affected.

They did not hurt anyone. It is a pity that their parents do not understand it

Finally thanks to your questioning I finally understood the starting point of all their worries.

So thank you for asking that questions.

reactionary69

Renita No. Why?

Laura

Vanessa Do you think about stains,too?

Much simpler, if a girl doesn't have sex with anybody she masturbates 😃

Vanessa

Laura Much simpler, if a girl doesn't have sex with anybody she masturbates 😃

Very probable,sure,but without proof,she shouldn't be punished.

And it would be a bit strange for reason to make her wear a chastity belt:"you don't have sex,so you've to wear a chastity belt.".

And unfair;no sex-->chastity belt;having sex-->chastity belt...

Laura

Vanessa And it would be a bit strange for reason to make her wear a chastity belt:"you don't have sex,so you've to wear a chastity belt.".

The reason for a chastity belt shouldn't be a result of her misbehavior, but to prevent it.

Vanessa

Laura The reason for a chastity belt shouldn't be a result of her misbehavior, but to prevent it.

Sure,but in this case,no matter what she does,she has to wear it,I don't feel it very fair.

And having to wear one because she don't do something the belt prevents is not logical.

Angelina I was punished, but with extra housework or writing essays, my father wanted me to take the time and strength to masturbate, but this did not work 😉

Not surprising,even if the idea was not bad.

Angelina no it was not directly forbidden to me but my father has the key to my door and so far it had always been all the same to me

Yes,not the same rule,but the same result.

Angelina and the parents therefore give the daughter a belt although she may not be sexually active (I know rather unlikely what masturbation concerns)

that is not fair for me and also not good for the relationship between parents and children

I agree.

It would have been harder for me to have one if I never did something forbidden(or if it was never noticed).

Angelina

@Vanessa

I was punished, but with extra housework or writing essays, my father wanted me to take the time and strength to masturbate, but this did not work 😉

no it was not directly forbidden to me but my father has the key to my door and so far it had always been all the same to me

@Laura

that would be a very daring assumption, where the parents could burn themselves easily 😉

and I think without proof, one cannot say that there was a misconduct 😉

Laura

Angelina and I think without proof, one cannot say that there was a misconduct

They don't need to prove anything, just ask her to wear a belt just because she is in fertile age.

Angelina

Laura

and the parents therefore give the daughter a belt although she may not be sexually active (I know rather unlikely what masturbation concerns)

that is not fair for me and also not good for the relationship between parents and children

Ines

Laura

Laura They don't need to prove anything, just ask her to wear a belt just because she is in fertile age.

I think this Is the idea, too

As for me, I did nothing before I have got the belt initially. So, it depends.

It is my situation too

Laura

Vanessa And having to wear one because she don't do something the belt prevents is not logical.

As for me, I did nothing before I have got the belt initially. So, it depends.

Vanessa

Laura As for me, I did nothing before I have got the belt initially. So, it depends.

Don't you feel it very unfait?

Ines

It is different for you,as you wear one willingly.

Angelina

I like your comparison.It fits well,I think.

Ines Angelina, it is not the same. To be in prison is lose life while you are inside the walls.

And a chastity belt is losing our sexual life.Which is an important part of our life.And it can impacts negatively other importants parts of our life,too;some activities are not possible,we have to wear clothes hiding it,it can be harder for us to dare to start dating...

Ines I will speak about my situation and opinion, of course.
Our belt is not similar to prison, they protect our feminity, do not steal it, it is caressed and protected until the person who I choice appear in my life.
I have the power of end my belting anytime and I have the power of choice the person who I want give my life.
Do you see because it is very different of a prison?

But,in your case,it is not forced,and you've more freedom.

Laura It's not a prison, but reasonable restriction, like drinking age, for example.

Drinking,too much or too often,can endanger our life.Masturbating,and,if carefu(I was),having sex,not much.Sure,doing it too much or too often,can cause problems too,but I think it is easier to drink too much/often than to do the same with sexual activities.

Angelina the example may have been a bit exaggerated

Not that much.

Angelina a chastity belt is a kind of prison, our drives our lust our sexuality no matter what you want to call it, it's in a prison

I agree.

Angelina I don't think it's necessary from the ground up to wear a cb if there is no real evidence or sign of sexual pleasure of the daughter 😉

Me too.Even if I don't like the idea to force a daughter to wear one,it should even less be used when there is no proof she disobeys,at least some stains on her sheets...

Angelina and i think "mom" understands my post and will follow it, we have a lot in common 🤣

Sure.😉

Laura

But,still,driving without a license is way more dangerous than having sex(with condom and on the pill).And,if you only sit in the car and don't drive(masturbate),it is not a problem!😉

Angelina

@Ines @Laura

I don't really understand your point of view.

a chastity belt is to put it bluntly a prison for the vagina, it would be the same reasoning for you to say that we imprison any person for a certain time in a prison without that person having committed a crime just because it could be that that person is becoming a criminal

in my opinion not logical

Ines

Angelina
Angelina, it is not the same. To be in prison is lose life while you are inside the walls.
I will speak about my situation and opinion, of course.
Our belt is not similar to prison, they protect our feminity, do not steal it, it is caressed and protected until the person who I choice appear in my life.
I have the power of end my belting anytime and I have the power of choice the person who I want give my life.
Do you see because it is very different of a prison?

Laura

Angelina it would be the same reasoning for you to say that we imprison any person for a certain time in a prison without that person having committed a crime

It's not a prison, but reasonable restriction, like drinking age, for example.

Esteban

Angelina I don't really understand your point of view.

a chastity belt is to put it bluntly a prison for the vagina, it would be the same reasoning for you to say that we imprison any person for a certain time in a prison without that person having committed a crime just because it could be that that person is becoming a criminal

in my opinion not logical

It's my pleasure to see you thinking like me. 😀

I feel that your message could have been written by me 😁

Do not worry, I will not ask you for copyright for that. 🤣

...

If you assume that the girl scrupulously respects the instructions of these parents (no sex before marriage) you logically conclude that the wearing of the belt would be useless and unfair since it would generate unnecessary stress for her.

For your part, if the young woman is docile and obedient, it would be useless to be forced her to wear such a thing as long as she wishes to respect the values of her parents.

It is therefore logical that you consider that the fact of imposing the wearing of the belt would be to put in prison for a crime that is suspected to commit.

For you it is totally illogical and incoherent to coerce a girl who wants to stay chaste. Your reasoning is therefore quite right.

...

But Ines and Laura do not consider the belt as a tool of repression (to be used to punish unauthorized behavior) but rather as a tool of prevention (aimed at preventing the girl from committing a fault).

In their reasoning, they assume that the girl's willingness to remain chaste will be very difficult to respect because of sexual drive and desire. They therefore suppose that the belt is a protection that will allow the girl not to succumb to the temptation of pleasure.

This is why you can not agree on this because you do not perceive the wearing of the belt in the same way.

Moreover Ines being a carrier "voluntary" and you carrier "constraint" that necessarily strengthens the divergence of view.

And for her part Laura has a "safety valve" with the ability to masturbate. So she can therefore consider personally feel that wearing her "abstinence" belt as a "reasonable restriction".

It is obvious that for Laura her stay "in prison" is much bearable for her than for you since she is entitled to "leave permissions".

The fact that you are "forced" and assigned to "absolute chastity" necessarily makes you much more rebellious against the belt than Ines or Laura. It's quite logical since you do not have the same wearing regime.

Angelina

Laura @Ines

the example may have been a bit exaggerated, but the actual logic remains the same, and yet, a chastity belt is a kind of prison, our drives our lust our sexuality no matter what you want to call it, it's in a prison

@Laura
You can bypass laws the cb doesn't 😂

Esteban

Laura It's not a prison, but reasonable restriction, like drinking age, for example.

Sorry Laura, but I can not let you say that since over 99.9% of people would wear a belt on a minor would be considered an "abuse of parental authority unacceptable" or even "device cruel and degrading for the dignity of the person ".

In a pinch I could admit that you write "personally" I consider the chastity belt as a reasonable restriction.

But in this case should not you change the mode "constrained" in the table by passing it in "accepted". Because for me: to consider that CB is a reasonable restriction is to admit the legitimacy of the port. And to admit the legitimacy of the wear of CB is to be a consenting carrier. No ?

...

In addition, you start from the reasoning that the belt should necessarily be used as a prevention tool to prevent accidental sexual relations before marriage.

But why not forbid all girls to get their driver's license so that they are never involved or responsible for a fatal road accident?

Indeed what will be the most dangerous danger to avoid for parents according to you?

That your child can lose his virginity by having fun with a loved one of him?
Or
That your child could dead on a car accident or have killed someone by carelessness on the road?

Strangely no parent of this forum went so far as to forbid his daughter to pass her driving license?

Must I infer that it would be more serious for them to lose his virginity than his own life?

« Previous Page Next Page »