Laura
No, no open with key.
I mean we have very few times the keys in our hands. I have shaked the padlock sometimes, but I have never try seriously to open it.
Always I ask with good reason for a belt opening, my parents open it as soon as possible.

    Ines No, my mother hold sisters keys.

    Maybe you should discuss this with her? If you have a Neosteel with a detachable secondary shield

    Ines

    The secondary shield is not needed to prevent intercourse(even without it,it is almost impossible),its main use is to prevent masturbation.

    No pinching for me either,but never worn it with the secondary shield off.

    Ines I have shaked the padlock sometimes

    I did,and still do,it often!

      Vanessa
      Secondary shield prevent smashing, what is not a minor thing) but pinches between belt and shield are possible, even more if you seat as a goat (as my sister). I think the closer both plates, It would be more comon. There was a belt in which the secondary shield was separated of belt with small steel bars. I dont remember the maker.
      But I think that it has to be unconfortable to sit, and awful under the clothes.
      I prefeer some small ouchie pinch sometimes.

        Ines I think the closer both plates, It would be more comon.

        Oh, I see what you mean now. I don't have such problem because there are side pins between shields.

        • Ines replied to this.

          Vanessa The secondary shield is not needed to prevent intercourse(even without it,it is almost impossible),its main use is to prevent masturbation.

          Also to prevent non-penetrative sex.

          Laura
          And is it more unconfortable for sit than more flat designs? When I saw it, it seemed me a great idea, but then I think in sitting or even cross legs if you are not wearing bands and I am not so secure about being a good idea.

            Ines You are right, I even don't try to cross the legs because of this "cage". But I never worn any other belts, so I can't say if flatter crotch is better or not. But will see.

            Prepare yourself for some ouchies! 😈but I think is a nicer design and can Be more confortable beside some pinch.

            Are you telling that a secondary shield with side pins between shields is more "bulge" outside, so there are problem to sit down on a chair? And that without pins is flatter but can pinch you (but you can si down easily)? so there isn't the perfect fitting.... mmmmm

              strictfather Are you telling that a secondary shield with side pins between shields is more "bulge" outside, so there are problem to sit down on a chair?

              No, it's only about crossing the legs. But you can't obtain it anyways.
              The bigger issue, it's not detachable.

              Vanessa not needed to prevent intercourse(even without it,it is almost impossible)

              It is not almost impossible it is absolutely impossible.

                strictfather
                Well, with a quality belt, well meassured and sitting as is supossed we have to do, pinches are few, but at least in my family girls it can pass sometimes, even walking.
                In an old forum, people told that in cheaper belts it is very very common, I gess it is due to a deficient adjustament.
                With a "flat" model, if the girls does not wear bands we can even wear trousers and concealing it, not tight trousers, of course.

                Renita

                I've to say I've litlle knowledge about how it is without it,as I've never been allowed to wear mine without it on.What's sure is,with the secondary shield,it is totally impossible to reach an orgasm.

                • Ines replied to this.

                  Vanessa
                  I think us we all use belt with secondary shield, at least the very most of time.
                  I fact, except cleaning duties there is not much reason, neither us nor our fathers, for do not use it.

                    Ines I fact, except cleaning duties there is not much reason, neither us nor our fathers, for do not use it.

                    I would prefer to not wear it, basically to have more freedom in relationships

                      Laura
                      πŸ˜…πŸ˜…of course all my respect towards your thinking, but, do not you think that your aproach is pervert a little the essence of wear a chastity belt?
                      And please, I am not pretend any criticism about your thinking (even I can understand it) but it can be some disruptive towards traditional approach πŸ˜†

                        Ines do not you think that your aproach is pervert a little the essence of wear a chastity belt?

                        It would still do the job it was supposed to initially πŸ™‚

                        • Ines replied to this.

                          Laura mmmm Mmmmm
                          Mmmm Mmmmm
                          (InΓ©s is not convinced).mmmmmm....
                          🀣🀣🀣
                          Mmmmmm

                          More Mmmmm πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‚

                            Ines In another words no threat to my virginity πŸ™‚

                            • Ines replied to this.