Ines In another words no threat to my virginity πŸ™‚

  • Ines replied to this.

    Laura
    Well, it will accomplished that mission. No doubts! πŸ˜…

    Laura
    Will your parents wear your new belt without it?
    Will see if you would be not only the only girl without bands but also the only without shield🀣

      Ines Will your parents wear your new belt without it?

      That was I'm going to convince them in. But if they read my previous posts, it will be impossible πŸ™‚

      Ines Will see if you would be not only the only girl without bands but also the only without shield

      @Renita did already

        Of the recent wave, at least!

        Basically the secondary shield make my belt chastity belt, rather than just virginity belt.
        And it's most hated piece of metal, without it things could be sorted out.

          Laura
          Bands are worst. At least for me. 😨 The shield not only protect or virtue... Protect our body of smahings when we sit!

          Laura Good girl πŸ™‚ Secondary shield is mandatory for you.
          I hope your parents read and do not allow you to fornicate.

          Girls, I apologize. I didn't think how it sounds
          And I should really have a secondary shield always locked.

          Laura @Renita did already

          You're wrong, I always wore with a attached secondary shield. And although I had a key, no one else could remove it.
          And sure no "non-penetrative sex".

          Ines I think us we all use belt with secondary shield, at least the very most of time.

          I think like you.

          Laura And it's most hated piece of metal, without it things could be sorted out.

          it's my opinion too,I guess there could be some more possibilities without it.

            Vanessa it's my opinion too,I guess there could be some more possibilities without it.

            However I must agree here that a girl in chastity belt, but without a secondary shield would have ... hmm.... bad reputation.

              Laura
              JAJAJAJAJAJA! Not so much as bad reputation! But for sure she will have sore crotch. Big pinches can occur.

              Laura

              i don't want to wear my belt without the secondary shield. as @Tere said, contusions can occur because the labia are not protected but can see through the first hole. this can be unpleasant and painful πŸ™

              i also think it is possible to mastubate without the secondary shield (unpleasant but possible), so i must never be without it. because mastubating was the trigger for my chastity

                Angelina i don't want to wear my belt without the secondary shield. as @Tere said, contusions can occur because the labia are not protected but can see through the first hole. this can be unpleasant and painful

                That was the main reason why my belt was ordered with the secondary shield initially.

                Angelina i also think it is possible to mastubate without the secondary shield (unpleasant but possible), so i must never be without it. because mastubating was the trigger for my chastity

                Masturbation is possible, but nobody else is involved by you. "More possibilities" in relationships is different, if a girl is involved in it, it's little better than she doesn't wear a belt at all. So she should always have the secondary shield on for a relationship.

                  Vanessa But much more pleasant feelings,I guess!

                  You also need a secondary shield

                    Actually, we all need it, at least the women who believe in the values of chastity.
                    Along with the most obvious consequence of avoid sexual activity of women while carrying it, the belt also has other implications for our lives.
                    On the one hand, it makes us have to endure, at times, our needs, and to have to focus on other tasks, despite the imperative appetite of our body to surrender to pleasure.
                    And secondly, the combination of belt and beloved man, makes me a much more loving wife, and (Ines do not read this), I think my husband will have few complaints in more than 23 years of marriage.
                    When I was in college, one of my roommates was a very religious girl, her parents were very closely linked to Opus Dei, but the poor, especially in exam times, could not help but succumb to pleasure.
                    Many nights I could hear her crying in her room, and the traces of the sackiness in the morning were terrifying. I was so overwhelmed with the situation, I was in that house for just over 6 months. All that suffering would have been avoided with a belt.
                    For women who value the value of chastity, we do not include in it only virginity, but our renunciation of control of our pleasure aand this is only possible by using a secondary shield, better if you can add bands to the set.

                    Without a belt, of course, you would all arrive with your virginity intact to your Prince Charming, but how many would we not have succumbed to having given us pleasure at some point?
                    That's why, from my perspective, the use of chastity belts should only be worn by those girls who are concerned about what I have written. If chastity, mettle, or surrender are not values of the girl (who will have equally respectable ones), wearing a belt can only be a source of anger and grudge.

                      We did not talk today :πŸ˜…, but I agree.
                      Chastity belt cares of my maidenhood, the shield and bands make it to take care of all me.

                      Tere And secondly, the combination of belt and beloved man, makes me a much more loving wife, and (Ines do not read this), I think my husband will have few complaints in more than 23 years of marriage.

                      What if an unwed girl has a beloved man, should she always wear a secondary shield in your opinion?