In my home it's c, hopefully it will also be e, too.
Déjà vu
6 days later
Laura Go somewhere outside.
Do they allow it?
Laura That's also not appreciated although they can't prevent it
Yes,they don't like it,but it can't be prevented as easily as intercourse and masturbation.And I think they probably know I do it to Emilie.
Renita Probably c and e for me too.Even if they won't like I do things "above the waist" too.
Laura Thank you for the nice list. I think we should start our own FAQ.
I agree.
6 days later
2 months later
Relevant Yahoo poll
"Do you agree that a parent has the right to use a chastity belt to preserve an underage daughter's virginity, prevent excessive masturbation or prevent her sleeping around?
- Yes, any of above would be a perfectly legitimate use of a chastity belt
- Yes on balance, but only if she would otherwise be putting herself at risk through underage sex
- Yes to preserve her virginity
- Yes, to prevent promiscuity
- Yes to prevent any masturbation
- Yes, though only to prevent excessive masturbation
- Unsure / really depends on situation
- Only if she fully consented to it
- Never, it would be psychologically damaging
- Never, it would be against her basic rights
- Never, and such a parent should be prosecuted"
- Edited
Renita
Only one answer is far from obvious to me.
I'm explain :
If the parents exert any slightest moral constraint in order to extort the consent of the girl I will be in perfect agreement with the last three proposals.
• Never, it would be psychologically damaging
• Never, it would be against her basic rights
• Never, and such a parent should be prosecuted"
But if the young woman believes that her belt will act as a protection against the potential male aggressors or can help her to get rid of a compulsive masturbatory practice that spoils her life, the 8th proposal « Only if she fully consented » to it remains acceptable.
Provided however that the girl is regular breaks to relieve himself (minimum of one hour each tonight before going to bed). She must not be trapped after accepting the principle of the belt.
Indeed if a girl agrees each evening a small moment of intimate happiness before falling asleep it would be far from compulsive masturbation as it presented at the beginning of the statement the question.
Between compulsive masturbation and prohibited masturbation there is room for compromise. No ?
- Edited
Angelina
Started 24 Dec, 2003
- Yes, any of above would be a perfectly legitimate use of a chastity belt 9%
- Yes on balance, but only if she would otherwise be putting herself at risk through underage sex 2%
- Yes to preserve her virginity 6%
- Yes, to prevent promiscuity 9%
- Yes to prevent any masturbation 4%
- Yes, though only to prevent excessive masturbation 2%
- Unsure / really depends on situation 5%
- Only if she fully consented to it 30%
- Never, it would be psychologically damaging 11%
- Never, it would be against her basic rights 12%
- Never, and such a parent should be prosecuted 10%
- Edited
Renita
His results are not exploitable.
Because to be meaningful a survey must be done according to a representative sample.
Moreover, we can legitimately assume that the most liberal parents will not have the idea of researching such issues beacuse they will find the absurd the original idea.
The other hand the sexual perverts will be the first to share their opinion in order to externalize their fantasy.
We all have that the theme of CB attract fetishists.
Laura "Everything needs to change, so (that) everything can stay the same. "
The Leopard (Italian: Il Gattopardo), a novel by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa.
Mea culpa for my Norwegian habits.
- Edited
Hi everybody! Recent arrived home 
.
Renta, as my mother has read everything already. They have a lot of experience reading things.
I only have read beltedgirls, and some things were discussed, with more or LESS, success there.
So many fetishist there, even some forum user was good.
Laura
If I try to follow your reasoning, you estimate that pool represented the philosophy of the population in 2003.
And do you think there are now fewer followers of the belt than 16 years ago?
Have I translated your thought well?
Because for my part I think the nombers of de pro -belted are been already over-valued in 2003.
Always with the same reasoning in my previous post.
I was also told that the early 2000s were flooded by the fetishist as soon as the topic of CB was discussed.
- Edited
Ines Recital, as my mother has read everything already.
Maybe she can contribute to the topic with ancient stories from older forums/groups
Esteban And do you think there are now fewer followers of the belt than 16 years ago?
Much more in my opinion. But I'm of newer generation, so it's harder to evaluate what was going on 16 years ago.
Laura Beaucoup plus à mon avis. Mais je suis de nouvelle génération, il est donc difficile d'évaluer ce qui se passait il y a 16 ans.
In fact I thought about the evolution of the development of chastity belts.
And here is my analysis.
We can assume that there are fewer parents who wish to restrict the sexual freedom of their daughter but that there are paradoxically more girls with girdles.
I develop my reasoning:
The evolution of morals goes in the direction of sex liberation (sex toy ...) but at the same time the development of the internet has made it easier for parents to acquire a chastity belt for their daughter.
Therefore, we would have an increase in the number of girls girded by their parents while having fewer parents who would like to gird their daughter.
Do you understand the subtlety of the paradox?