Tollyboy odd jobs

youdontknowme

Tonyand03 according to that would-be customer, that is better than if you found the post welding.

Vanessa

Taz

Interesting subject.

Taz

I wonder how he knew about chastity belts without knowing what he wanted was impossible...

youdontknowme

🤣

Taz

Funny idea!😉

Laura

Good question.

Taz

The smallest belt we ever made was a variation on the standard FGA/200 female belt. It had a solid metal bar at the back instead of the usual cable a hinged waistband one of only two hinged belts I can remember and no secondary shield. There was a lot of fine, fancy detail that I actually subcontracted to a friend in the jewellery trade. It was supplied with one key. When finished and fitted it was obviously tiny, fitted like a glove, made of solid 9 carat gold it keeps a Barbie Doll chaste.

youdontknowme

Taz Love the twist at the end. I assume the "lock" is more of a closure with removable, key-shaped actuator? I doubt you can scale a secure lock down to Barbie size.

Also, how would Barbie dolls be "kept chaste"? Without genitalia, it is not like there is any unchaste behavior that could be prevented?

Laura

Taz and no secondary shield

Just curious what's the percentage of belts without a secondary shield nowadays

gwen

youdontknowme Also, how would Barbie dolls be "kept chaste"? Without genitalia, it is not like there is any unchaste behavior that could be prevented?

I believe this is called "defense in depth" 🤣

Taz

youdontknowme Love the twist at the end. I assume the "lock" is more of a closure with removable, key-shaped actuator? I doubt you can scale a secure lock down to Barbie size.

Yes it was but now you have me thinking, I get into more trouble that way. The pins in a standard lock are 0.080 inches diameter (American locks) and the longest of them is 0.195 inches long. The waist of a Mattel Barbie is 3.75 inches so about 1/10 of the average adult female. Therefore lock pins would be 0.008" and max 0.020" long, the springs would be about the same. The body of the lock (not the lock block) would be 0.075". So in European measurements, it would depend on my ability to make pins 0.2mm in diameter and less than 0.5mm in length. Too small for my current machinery but reasonably large by the standards of Swiss watchmaking. Maybe I can find a kinky watchmaker to help me one day.

Taz

youdontknowme Also, how would Barbie dolls be "kept chaste"? Without genitalia

I noticed she appeared to be tightly infibulated when I was measuring her.

Raziel

The whole idea to design a belt without hinges sounds nearly impossible, unless you make it where it snaps together, making it impossible to remove afterwards. Plus, you'd have to consider that adjustments would need to be made in the future between shaping and wearing in various positions. The long-term concern is the weight management of the person, where if they expect to keep this idea plausible, they'd have to live on a strict lifestyle.

youdontknowme

Raziel The whole idea to design a belt without hinges sounds nearly impossible, unless you make it where it snaps together, making it impossible to remove afterwards.

Steel is bendy, especially in reasonably thin bands. Making such bands in the size of the wearer in question is a different challenge.

Taz The waist of a Mattel Barbie is 3.75 inches so about 1/10 of the average adult female.

Was surprised about that, especially considering Barbie's figure, but it works out realatively well. Volume does scale with the cube of linear dimensions after all.

Taz Too small for my current machinery but reasonably large by the standards of Swiss watchmaking. Maybe I can find a kinky watchmaker to help me one day.

I am not sure proportional scaling addresses all structural concerns, like rigidity, tolerances and lubrication. However, the square-cube law might be in your favor in some of those regards.

Joh

Raziel
I have read about metal with memory effect. After it is bent and retains its shape, you heat it and it goes back to its old shape. It is apparently used as a replacement for discs. So the temperature can't be that high.
The hip band would be shaped to fit the hip, bent open, put on, heated and it would bend back.

Taz

Angelina this idea alone seems very utopian to me, the belt would weigh more than i would myself

Yes, the customer may be perfectly sane in the rest of life but when it comes to chastity any sense of reality is just gone. Even back then there were enough online calculators that they could have checked metal density and calculated an approximate mass for the belt. They could just have looked at the padlock they bought and thought this weighs 5kg and the belt will be several times heavier than that. They could even have just put on 6 or 8 adult nappies to simulate the bulk of it to see if they could hide it under clothes. But did they, no.

Angelina

Taz to see if they could hide it under clothes. But did they, no.

ok, so at the latest when i imagine hiding such a belt under my clothes i have to start laughing, the picture in my mind's eye has really saved my day, thank you. 🤣

Angelina

Vanessa I wonder how he knew about chastity belts without knowing what he wanted was impossible...

this is not surprising, my father would prefer my belt to be closed at the back (even though i am not interested in anal sex), but he also wants me to be able to go to the toilet without problems.... sometimes it is difficult to combine different interests

Martin

Angelina my father would prefer my belt to be closed at the back

My new belt will be lockable even on the backside. So it could be used as a swimsuit. ;-)

Vanessa

Angelina sometimes it is difficult to combine different interests

It is a cable rear belt,in this case!😉

Taz permanent anal plug

Seems very dangerous!

Even if taken off for toilet use.

Taz I imagine the cleanest thing to use.

It can lead to health problems,I think.

Taz

Could work,but I doubt many places would have it,except if chastity belts become very common!

Angelina which is also good for me. 😉

😉

Angelina of course, but my father, if he wanted to do it, he would do it seriously and that means he would worry (sounds complicated, but it's all theoretical) about what i do in public toilets. 😉

He would not prefer using it,even if not totally secure if you have the keys,instead of not using it?

youdontknowme

Taz it was to be locked with some some huge industrial padlock that they brought with them probably weighing about 5kg

Going back to the first story, I imagine this sort of like a cartoon chastity belt with the oversized padlock loosely dangling from the front. Thigh bands would be a mandatory accessory for that; if the wearer started running, the knocking might injure her otherwise.

Angelina

Martin My new belt will be lockable even on the backside. So it could be used as a swimsuit. ;-)

but if it is closed at the back, toilet visits (at least for the big) are impossible

youdontknowme

Angelina Latowski offers an anal cover plate that can be locked onto the belt without removing it using a little cam lock. Which would allow it to be used for short periods where there is an elevated danger of the rear opening being abused, or for making the belt a street-legal, if extravagant piece of clothing.

There is also a version of that cover that includes a little rod you can attach various items to, but those items generally do not promote being chaste.

Martin

Angelina but if it is closed at the back, toilet visits (at least for the big) are impossible

The keys for backplate will stay with me all the time of course.

Mr. Youdontknowme said it correctly.

Taz

Angelina but if it is closed at the back, toilet visits (at least for the big) are impossible

There has been a suggested solution to that. I don't think anyone has ever built it but it was suggested to me that the supermarkt have shopping trollies that are tethered by chains to the wall or to each other you insert a euro and it releases. Could I not adapt this mechanism to the rear of a belt so that there is a short tether behind the toilet. You sit down and clip this tether into place this anchors you to the chain and releases the back of the belt. When you are finished clipping the back of the belt closed releases the chain and you can again move freely.

I don't know how the mechanism works, clearly what is on a trolley is too bulky and you are limited to toilets fitted with the appropriate locking tether so basically only at home or perhaps friends places who don't mind having a chain screwed to the wall. You could of course take a tether end with you when you go out but it defeats the purpose of it.

Angelina

youdontknowme

yes, i know these cover plates, but that would not solve my father's "problem" (i don't see it as a problem 😉 ) because when the plate is in place, only he could open it, bad if i am in the public

youdontknowme

Angelina because when the plate is in place, only he could open it, bad if i am in the public

It could be keyed to use different keys than the belt. Looks like the belt uses single-sided pin-tumbler locks while the cover uses a two-sided wafer lock, so it is very unlikely one key would work for both. Which makes the butt cover no security downgrade, but giving the wearer the key of course limits its usefulness as a security upgrade as well.

Eliminating what is commonly referred to as the "poophole loophole" (see also: Garfunkel and Oates - The Loophole) without significantly impeding unsupervised long-term wear is perhaps one of the more difficult engineering problems in chastity belt design, and (to get back to topic) I am sure Mr. Tollyboy has some interesting stories about overconfident clients who believe that problem to be solved.

Angelina

Martin The keys for backplate will stay with me all the time of course.

ok, then it works for your goals, but it wouldn't work for my father, which is also good for me. 😉

youdontknowme It could be keyed to use different keys than the belt.

of course, but my father, if he wanted to do it, he would do it seriously and that means he would worry (sounds complicated, but it's all theoretical) about what i do in public toilets. 😉

Taz

thanks for the idea, it's very interesting but probably a bit too complicated for everyday use and if you don't know how to build something like that i doubt other manufacturers do.

« Previous Page Next Page »