i agree with you completely on the first part. on the second part you seem to be getting a bit worked up. you can't control love, it's there or it's not. not everyone makes the promise to god (i won't) and for me marriage doesn't mean love until death, but the promise to try everything to make the marriage last until the end of life, but no one should be unhappily married.
Chastity belt law
Angelina Depends on whether your objective is to preserve virginity or to prevent unmarried sex. If the objective is the latter, then it only matters whether the person is married now, not whether they have been in the past. Same with widows.
Angelina yes, but then it can happen that a woman stays in the belt until she dies, scary idea or marries a man by force in order not to die as a virgin.
Right,it would not be very good in such cases...
As it would be a dystopie,I guess it would mean back in the chastity belt.
It was meant about the wearing of chastity devices.
youdontknowme Depends on whether your objective is to preserve virginity or to prevent unmarried sex. If the objective is the latter, then it only matters whether the person is married now, not whether they have been in the past.
Right.
i agree with you, but my answer was not really related to the goal of the belt, but only my opinion on the mother's statement.
Vanessa It was meant about the wearing of chastity devices.
I know I took the sentence out of context, but that was my intention, because this sentence is simply wrong (my opinion).
Vanessa a woman would have to wear it again until married again.
Hence you support my mom's decision.
- Edited
Angelina At least better than an unhappy marriage
Not at least, but much better, because single again chastity.
Renita Not at least, but much better, because single again chastity.
however. i would prefer chastity at least to an unhappy marriage/relationship
