Chastity belt law

HHelen

Vanessa it would mean back in the chastity belt

"It would mean" or "It would be mean"?

Vanessa

HHelen

In this context,a woman would have to wear it again until married again.

HHelen

Vanessa a woman would have to wear it again until married again.

Therefore it's mean.

Christine

Vanessa a woman would have to wear it again until married again.

Hence you support my mom's decision.

Angelina

HHelen Therefore it's mean.

depends on what the goal is, if the goal is to maintain virginity it is of course also nonsense

Vanessa

HHelen

Not that much in this dystopie.

Angelina

Of course.

But not sure it is the goal,in this case.

HHelen

Angelina if the goal is to maintain virginity it is of course also nonsense

She would have to maintain her marital status at any cost, because it's only way to avoid a chastity belt.

Angelina

Vanessa But not sure it is the goal,in this case.

yes, I am not 100% sure either

Vanessa

Christine

Only in a dystopie using a chastity belt law.

Renita

Better than an unhappy marriage,yes.

Angelina At least better than an unhappy marriage

😉

Renita

HHelen Chastity belt is not end of life.

Angelina

HHelen She would have to maintain her marital status at any cost, because it's only way to avoid a chastity belt.

which would be terrible if she were unhappily married.

Renita Chastity belt is not end of life.

At least better than an unhappy marriage

Max9

Renita that's true, for some people it means the behinning of life

Renita

Angelina At least better than an unhappy marriage

Not at least, but much better, because single again chastity.

HHelen

Angelina which would be terrible if she were unhappily married.

Her marriage would be only for status, that gives he a right to not wear a belt and be in a relationship with someone else.

Angelina

Renita Not at least, but much better, because single again chastity.

however. i would prefer chastity at least to an unhappy marriage/relationship

Angelina

Vanessa Only in a dystopie using a chastity belt law.

wait and see how it develops in a few years time

Christine

Vanessa Only in a dystopie using a chastity belt law.

She believes it's real.

Vanessa If she's unhappy,she should divorce instead of staying married and have a lover.

Agree.

HHelen Different status.

Why?

Vanessa

Angelina

I doubt it would happen.

Angelina

I agree.

If she's unhappy,she should divorce instead of staying married and have a lover.

Renita

Not if they're discreet enough.

Angelina

HHelen

yes, but i don't like sham marriages, for me they have the wrong moral concepts.

Renita

HHelen that gives he a right to not wear a belt

Unless her current husband requires it.

HHelen

Angelina but i don't like sham marriages, for me they have the wrong moral concepts.

This is reality, despite it's wrong. I have few female friends doing it.

Renita Unless her current husband requires it.

If he is aware of.

Renita

HHelen If he is aware of.

Somebody would tell him.

Angelina

HHelen This is reality, despite it's wrong. I have few female friends doing it.

I know it is reality, but in my opinion it is worse than chastity and absolutely unacceptable.

Vanessa I doubt it would happen.

i can no longer be surprised by politics i can now imagine anything 😉

Vanessa If she's unhappy,she should divorce instead of staying married and have a lover.

I agree

« Previous Page Next Page »