Chastity belt law

Vanessa it would mean back in the chastity belt

"It would mean" or "It would be mean"?

HHelen

In this context,a woman would have to wear it again until married again.

Vanessa a woman would have to wear it again until married again.

Therefore it's mean.

HHelen Therefore it's mean.

depends on what the goal is, if the goal is to maintain virginity it is of course also nonsense

Vanessa a woman would have to wear it again until married again.

Hence you support my mom's decision.

Vanessa But not sure it is the goal,in this case.

yes, I am not 100% sure either

Angelina if the goal is to maintain virginity it is of course also nonsense

She would have to maintain her marital status at any cost, because it's only way to avoid a chastity belt.

HHelen Chastity belt is not end of life.

Renita that's true, for some people it means the behinning of life

Renita Not at least, but much better, because single again chastity.

however. i would prefer chastity at least to an unhappy marriage/relationship

Christine

Only in a dystopie using a chastity belt law.

Renita

Better than an unhappy marriage,yes.

Angelina At least better than an unhappy marriage

Vanessa Only in a dystopie using a chastity belt law.

wait and see how it develops in a few years time

Angelina which would be terrible if she were unhappily married.

Her marriage would be only for status, that gives he a right to not wear a belt and be in a relationship with someone else.

HHelen

yes, but i don't like sham marriages, for me they have the wrong moral concepts.

HHelen that gives he a right to not wear a belt

Unless her current husband requires it.

Angelina but i don't like sham marriages, for me they have the wrong moral concepts.

This is reality, despite it's wrong. I have few female friends doing it.

Renita Unless her current husband requires it.

If he is aware of.

HHelen If he is aware of.

Somebody would tell him.