Chastity belt law

Avery C'est vrai, but what a break thru, masturbation stimulating the economy as well as the customers.

I am reminded of a news article from a while ago, where masseuses in Indonesia were expected to lock their clothing to prevent customers from demanding more than just a "happy ending". Which apparently became a problem after the government cracked down on prostitution in an effort to enforce islamic values.

Vanessa No need to wait if the two partners agree to divorce,however.

interesting, but frankly i think our system is better. marriage is a serious thing and so is divorce, you should have time to think about it.

HHelen But I have a realistic view.

no, you have a pessimistic view, i know it quite differently

Vanessa They should think about divorce before asking for it,not after.

yes, i agree with you, but because many people don't do it it this year. besides, it's to prevent us from getting remarried too quickly.

Angelina it's to prevent us from getting remarried too quickly.

Do you think it is a good idea?

Vanessa Do you think it is a good idea?

yes i think so. i think that if you have a new partner you should separate from your old partner. and a year is not too long to wait, besides you can be sure if you really want to marry your new partner.

Vanessa You think dating someone else during the one year wait is a good idea?

of course dating is ok, but in my opinion you should already think about it seriously before the separation. i would at least say that if the separation were to take place, it would also be the end for me because i would think about it carefully.

Angelina

So,in your case,the one year wait would be useless,because you would be sure you want to divorce at the start.

Don't you think dating during it would be like cheating?

Vanessa

yes, for me personally it would be pointless, but for many couples it is very good and no i don't think it is cheating because you are separated during this time.

Angelina maybe no belt during the separation, but as soon as she has sex with another man, she has to wear the belt again (difficult to control)?

Yes, it is difficult, and it is the masturbation too, I am sure most of us would lie.
It is much better mandatory for every single and separated woman... however, for sure most of wives would wear it too due I am sure they would not like be the only available targets.

Ines due I am sure they would not like be the only available targets

Or like it more.

Renita
However, probably it would not be good for their marriage.

Ines Masturbation is sex... I would not allow it either.

But then it would be very difficult to get a majority for it.

Ines Nice picture. They suck.

I agree with you

Ines Yes, it is difficult, and it is the masturbation too,

so even in my imagination all chastity belt laws stop at that point. controlling sex i would think theoretically possible, but controlling mastubation by the government i don't think possible.

Ines probably it would not be good for their marriage

Their husbands should take care.

Angelina controlling sex i would think theoretically possible, but controlling mastubation by the government i don't think possible.

That just depends on the rule about the belt.
In this scenario, having all single or separated women over a certain age wear a belt is a very reliable way to ensure this.
They would only be "out of control" if some girl did things before reaching the age or married women, but in that case the state would no longer be responsible.

Angelina But then it would be very difficult to get a majority for it.

I think even then it might be possible.
I think that, in general, there is a lot of hypocrisy about female sexuality.
Even in the most conservative circles, and I'm talking about when girls wear chastity belts, initially it's always motivated by preventing loss of virginity, but when it's discovered that the belt also prevents masturbation this is always a nice side effect.
In a conservative society, hypothetically, many parents would vote for this and even some girls, like me, would think about maybe supporting it.

Ines They would only be "out of control" if some girl did things before reaching the age

and that's where the problems with masturbation would start. let's say the rule is 18 and over. i only have to think of my old school and i would say that about 40-50% had sex, but at least 90% masturbated. it would cause enormous problems if the girls were put on cold turkey on their 18th birthday.

Ines In a conservative society, hypothetically, many parents would vote for this and even some girls, like me, would think about maybe supporting it.

in conservative circles maybe, but i would say when i think of our major parties that even the conservatives would not be in favour of it. i think that would be a bit too much. sex is something else, because sex if it is not well thought out can lead to something bad, mastubation does not harm as long as it is not excessive. so there is a lack of reasoning.

Angelina it would cause enormous problems if the girls were put on cold turkey on their 18th birthday.

I didn't mind as much as some of the people here because I didn't masturbate.
Of course I also didn't get online and write offensive stories but I had a lot of help from the start.

Angelina
I think no one was thinking about politics or today's society, in fact, I don't think a state should get involved in that.
Even today, some people would vote against their conscience believing that it is the right thing to do.
I also don't think a belt is a good idea for each and every one of us.

What I disagree with you is that nothing would happen to avoid masturbation. What's more, and following the game of this conservative society a bit, even if you want to put it to the vote, it would be enough to raise the age necessary to vote.