Angelina maybe no belt during the separation, but as soon as she has sex with another man, she has to wear the belt again (difficult to control)?
Yes, it is difficult, and it is the masturbation too, I am sure most of us would lie.
It is much better mandatory for every single and separated woman... however, for sure most of wives would wear it too due I am sure they would not like be the only available targets.
Ines Masturbation is sex... I would not allow it either.
But then it would be very difficult to get a majority for it. 
Ines Nice picture. They suck.
I agree with you
Ines Yes, it is difficult, and it is the masturbation too,
so even in my imagination all chastity belt laws stop at that point. controlling sex i would think theoretically possible, but controlling mastubation by the government i don't think possible.
Angelina controlling sex i would think theoretically possible, but controlling mastubation by the government i don't think possible.
That just depends on the rule about the belt.
In this scenario, having all single or separated women over a certain age wear a belt is a very reliable way to ensure this.
They would only be "out of control" if some girl did things before reaching the age or married women, but in that case the state would no longer be responsible.
Angelina But then it would be very difficult to get a majority for it.
I think even then it might be possible.
I think that, in general, there is a lot of hypocrisy about female sexuality.
Even in the most conservative circles, and I'm talking about when girls wear chastity belts, initially it's always motivated by preventing loss of virginity, but when it's discovered that the belt also prevents masturbation this is always a nice side effect.
In a conservative society, hypothetically, many parents would vote for this and even some girls, like me, would think about maybe supporting it.
Ines They would only be "out of control" if some girl did things before reaching the age
and that's where the problems with masturbation would start. let's say the rule is 18 and over. i only have to think of my old school and i would say that about 40-50% had sex, but at least 90% masturbated. it would cause enormous problems if the girls were put on cold turkey on their 18th birthday.
Ines In a conservative society, hypothetically, many parents would vote for this and even some girls, like me, would think about maybe supporting it.
in conservative circles maybe, but i would say when i think of our major parties that even the conservatives would not be in favour of it. i think that would be a bit too much. sex is something else, because sex if it is not well thought out can lead to something bad, mastubation does not harm as long as it is not excessive. so there is a lack of reasoning.
Angelina
I think no one was thinking about politics or today's society, in fact, I don't think a state should get involved in that.
Even today, some people would vote against their conscience believing that it is the right thing to do.
I also don't think a belt is a good idea for each and every one of us.
What I disagree with you is that nothing would happen to avoid masturbation. What's more, and following the game of this conservative society a bit, even if you want to put it to the vote, it would be enough to raise the age necessary to vote.
i don't quite understand the point you're trying to make. in this whole topic i was imagining what a law would look like and whether it would be possible to find a majority for it in society and in politics. and my answer would be yes if it's only about sex and no if masturbation is also "banned".
I had a great time reading this thread.
Although it is a thread about counterfactual elements, I think that the positions of many forum users are crystal clear.
I believe that this law would have many problems on a day-to-day basis, but if I work with my imagination a bit, I think that in theory, it is positive.
In my opinion, I think that a reasonable age limit would be menopause.
Although I see it as correct that the law was limited to unmarried women, in the end I believe that married women would end up wearing belts. First, some husband would not like his wife to be one of the few options for other men, and, probably, if she wears a belt, either because of pressure from husbands, or because of women for not wanting to appear "women easy", in the end it would spread.
And also, even if it's half in jest, it's okay for married women to wear it because that way, if they want to put their husband's bags at the door, they do it without thinking that it will mean wearing the belt.
I liked this thread, very well run, and without reading the sad things that are sometimes in others.
I'm so torn. It's so wrong but it would be so free to just have chastity be normal not have to explain why.
So I think it starts with the belts - like off the shelf secure and comfortable belts would be needed - that can just be worn not have training and hygiene problems.
And I want to think about here - I know some places have horrible inequality and the government would do things - but here I think it would start with women fighting to have agreements recognised. Like if someone offered to pay for my uni - but needed a binding chastity belt contract - probably can't be done but why not like we financial contracts for lones which affect us for decades. So yeah having contracts be actually binding is first - then it can spread
Jen I entirely agree that normalizing belts would change a lot of things. Also agreed that the dystopian ābelts by law for all unmarried womenā version makes for a great setup for chastity fic but a terrible real world! But itās interesting to consider a world where chastity agreements can be enforced; would there be government chastity monitors? That would get real weird, real quick.
It would just be wonderful if the government would make belts available for any "adult" woman that wants one. Kind of like Covid vaccine in the US. That would eliminate the cost issue and would normalize belt wearing to some degree.
bdsamm that would certainly be fascinating! You might even get some current US leaders on board with it in some states. Lord knows there are enough religious fanatics who would genuinely lock up women en masse. But I donāt see it happening any time soon.
Saintprudence But itās interesting to consider a world where chastity agreements can be enforced; would there be government chastity monitors? That would get real weird, real quick.
interesting, if it were introduced like this, suddenly all the contracts i made with my father about it would be legally enforceable. kind of a scary idea because it's always been a private thing
the idea could definitely be implemented in practice and would lead to normalization
I have another question for everyone
what is your opinion on replacing prison sentences with chastity sentences? So someone who gets 5 years in prison would get 5 years in a chastity belt instead. The question arises above all in relation to pure sexual offences
Angelina interesting, if it were introduced like this, suddenly all the contracts i made with my father about it would be legally enforceable. kind of a scary idea because it's always been a private thing
Thatās one of the reasons it makes me nervous, too. Still, we would never see chastity devices go mainstream until culture is ready for mature discussions about sex. There are only two reasons to be locked into a belt: to prevent masturbation and to prevent sex. People just arenāt ready for that conversation. I would love it if my belt were as commonly accepted as, say, the bulky braces I wore after my car crash years ago. But the difference is, nobody gets nervous and red-faced when talking about rehab equipment from a car crash. They get VERY weird about talking about masturbating-prevention equipment, though.
