Chastity belt law

Addendum: A serious community chastity law would have to address gender in some way; there are those who believe chastity is for women only and I can sympathize with that position, but it’s not exactly workable. I would propose that such a law have the following parameters for all residents of Chastity Colony Alpha:

• unmarried adults are subject to the belt at the behest of their authority figures, in the hierarchy determined elsewhere.

• Anyone living alone must be under authority.

• In married couples, any gender arrangement is acceptable. However, one member of the marriage must be designated the authority and the other under their charge. There does not have to be a belted person in the house, but there must be the knowledge that one half of the couple is subject to belting at any time.

• Social pressure would, of course, make it likely that belting authority is almost always used in marriages. Unbelted couple would be considered “weird” or “un-mutual” by their peers. There’s a part of me that wonders if further controls should be exercises on the charges, such as needing spousal approval for major purchases, but this is about chastity belting, not creating a new underclass (which the belt law will do sufficiently well enough on its own.)

Owl So for now, let me just focus on one aspect and possible shortcoming in "your" version of the law: I'd say, to make a judge rule in favor of that chastity with full conviction, some bad things must already have happened. Unfortunately and from my experience, these could easily mean very serious, sometimes irreversible things

i agree, but of course there must be a concrete reason for the belt. no judge should be allowed to order/permit it just because of the fear of the parents. there must be reasons otherwise every girl wears a belt even if she is a good girl.

Saintprudence What is the role of trans people here?

I have only formulated the suggestion for women because it is most accepted here on the forum that girls/women wear a belt. but you can also apply the law to boys, transsexuals or other gender identities. just as well, anyone can be a keyholder.

Saintprudence This almost wants me to create a new kind of angle to examine these topics, “Chastity Law Case Studies.” “Sally W. is an unwed college grad student who has has two abortions and no intention of giving up sex. Her parents have petitioned to have her belted until marriage. She objects. What does the Unwed Chastity jury decide?”

i would say she would almost be the perfect example for my idea. not only has she behaved wrongly, but she also does not want to change her behaviour. in this case, i would say that the judge should agree to the parents' request.

Saintprudence because I try to take this place seriously and keep made-up weirdness to a minimum.

if you tag it with a fantasy tag it should not be a problem

Saintprudence And what would happen if she “did not fulfill her marital obligations”? Is this grounds for divorce, or are you proposing it is grounds for belting?

currently it can be a reason for divorce, at least in germany. i considered it more as a reason for the belt here, of course. maybe it would also make wives (or husbands) think and there would be fewer divorces.
For example: Camryn and I were married and she would not perform her marital duties, then I would petition the court to have her wear a belt until she performs her duties again, the court can agree or deny.

Saintprudence Anyone living alone must be under authority.

who should be this authority in your proposal?

Angelina who should be this authority in your proposal?

It would seem such a law dictates a hierarchy: Husband first, followed by father, mother, brothers and sisters starting with eldest brother, in-laws. If a person has no available relatives, a government-sponsored monitor would take charge of their chastity.

Angelina no judge should be allowed to order/permit it just because of the fear of the parents. there must be reasons otherwise every girl wears a belt even if she is a good girl.

Based on the “you be the judge” thread, it would seem to be the opinion of the forum is that “having sex outside of marriage, ever” counts as good reasons!

All my made-up cases thus far involve sex. Maybe I should pose a masturbation-only case!

Angelina I have only formulated the suggestion for women because it is most accepted here on the forum that girls/women wear a belt. but you can also apply the law to boys, transsexuals or other gender identities.

I genuinely appreciate your recognition of trans people .

Saintprudence It would seem such a law dictates a hierarchy: Husband first, followed by father, mother, brothers and sisters starting with eldest brother, in-laws. If a person has no available relatives, a government-sponsored monitor would take charge of their chastity.

sounds very well thought out, almost like an order of inheritance

Saintprudence All my made-up cases thus far involve sex. Maybe I should pose a masturbation-only case!

I admit I haven't read the thread yet because I've been online here for far too long and won't do it until tomorrow (or tonight), I think cases of masturbation can also play a role, for example when the daughter skips school to masturbating at home or something

Angelina I admit I haven't read the thread yet because I've been online here for far too long and won't do it until tomorrow (or tonight)

It’s already kind of a mammoth thread because I got pretty creative! And I can only guess your reaction to some of them .

Saintprudence And I can only guess your reaction to some of them .

who knows, i'm full of surprises

This topic to talk about theorical mandatory usage.

Ines Keyholding hierarchy would be: father, legal guardian, uncle, older brother, younger brother, friend with judicial authorization, mother.

Are you certain "younger brother" should be on that list??? I don't have a younger brother and I don't thing there are any younger brothers in my extended families but I have seen some in other families and I just don't know if that would work well...

What about a group or small community of straight women. Like a accountability church or something so long as it's boring and not some sort of sorority party...

Megan I think it would depend on the age of the younger brother - I wouldn’t trust anyone under 18.

Megan Are you certain "younger brother" should be on that list???

Ines That is why I included, with a low level, the authority of a younger brother.

i think a younger brother can also be a keyholder, but he as well as an older brother or friend/uncle should not stand in front of the mother.

for unmarried women I would say
Father, mother, older sibling (whether male or female), younger sibling (whether male or female), a person designated by the court.

Ines The system of use and accessories depend on the keyholder, although the woman has the option to appeal if she believes there is abuse. Quick trial in 24 hours. Loss of keyholding liability.

so in the end a court would decide if a chastity bra or thighbands are ok?

Ines Medical exam every six months, or weekly in educational centers, for single women.

You mean virginity?

Angelina for unmarried women I would say
Father, mother, older sibling (whether male or female), younger sibling (whether male or female), a person designated by the court.

I think that’s ok, but there would have to be a minimum age for the younger sibling to be responsible for the key holding.

hanna_anders I think that’s ok, but there would have to be a minimum age for the younger sibling to be responsible for the key holding.

yes, i agree with you. the only exception would be if the wearer of the belt clearly wants a person (even under the minimum age) to get the keys. but then the wearer has to assure in writing that he takes responsibility for the complete deal.

Laura You mean virginity?

Yes, with this law I think is unavoidable.

Angelina so in the end a court would decide if a chastity bra or thighbands are ok?

The regime of usage.

Ines The regime of usage.

I think it's fair, but it needs a clear legal basis and independent judges to decide.

independence is particularly important here. we would not be good judges, for example.

Ines That is nice idea...