No! I am not so bad.
I said them, even, that 4 days without releases is a big amount of time, I barely can remember 4 days without releases.
But one thing is a release because good reason and another one is "a vacation".
I respect the expectations of every one about the belt, I am sure there are girls who use the belt for a purpose and a vacation can be acceptable, but this is not the case.
Right time to tell a man you wear chastity belt
Laura We just don't want to give her a false hope
still better than no hope at all (in my opinion)
i just remembered that i read something on some websites about a "locktober", that is for non-belt wearers a month in which they lock themselves into a chastity belt and are chaste for a month. why not reverse the principle for us? i want the "unlock-august"
Raziel Just random advice, don't worry about it.
ok, no problem
Angelina i want the "unlock-august"
I am afraid you would have to come up with a better pun. In the vein of no nut november and fap free february, perhaps something like security-softening september might work?
yes the word game was not good but august is usually the warmest and so it would help but i would also support your idea
Raziel The opposite of Locktober could be Outober, where you're... "out."
I like Outober very much too
Maybe if we ever find ourselves in that horribly sexist fantasy world where all girls are locked while the boys roam free, we could establish both. Girls get out for a month while the boys have to restrain themselves. Still half the population locked so no funny business that could result in things like unplanned pregnancies, but the world would be a little fairer, long-term wearers get a well-earned break and long-term non-wearers a much-overdue lesson in delayed gratification.
youdontknowme No. Chastityty belts have to be orderet for both. Otherwise it will be REALY unfair.
if we lived in this kind of world, i would agree with @Kaja, then both genders should have to wear a belt and the "outober" should apply to everyone
Angelina Obviously establishing some more gender equality should be the long-term goal, but I doubt that would be easy to achieve in a world where the rules, customs and traditions were as one-sided as that. And I reckon the only way to convince the people who came up with the idea of locking girls up in the first place would be to have different free months for boys and for girls.
Who knows, you might even get 6 free months out of it in the end.
i would agree if there were different months, then at least there would be no illicit sex, but i think the months should be evenly distributed. however, i also admit that it would probably find less acceptance this way (especially with men).