Jen
No, never.
I have told with her, so she knows the principles.
To fix the conditions is very important, and when they are settled, they have to be respected.
But I will not defend a pasture against @Raquel wishes, even if privately I say her that she is wrong.

  • Jen likes this.

    Laura We just don't want to give her a false hope

    still better than no hope at all (in my opinion) 😂

    i just remembered that i read something on some websites about a "locktober", that is for non-belt wearers a month in which they lock themselves into a chastity belt and are chaste for a month. why not reverse the principle for us? i want the "unlock-august" 😂

    Raziel Just random advice, don't worry about it.

    ok, no problem 😉

          Angelina i want the "unlock-august" 😂

          I am afraid you would have to come up with a better pun. In the vein of no nut november and fap free february, perhaps something like security-softening september might work?

              Ines Uncles... uncle and aunt!

              But the idea comes from aunt, doesn't it?

              • Ines replied to this.

                  Renita But the idea comes from aunt, doesn't it?

                  I think in my family is always something more feminine. 😂

                    youdontknowme

                    yes the word game was not good but august is usually the warmest and so it would help but i would also support your idea 😉

                    Raziel The opposite of Locktober could be Outober, where you're... "out."

                    I like Outober very much too 😉

                          Raquel Yes, what you say is true, but it seems to me much harder than I thought.

                          Any progress in it?

                            Raziel The opposite of Locktober could be Outober, where you're... "out."

                            Angelina I like Outober very much too

                            Maybe if we ever find ourselves in that horribly sexist fantasy world where all girls are locked while the boys roam free, we could establish both. Girls get out for a month while the boys have to restrain themselves. Still half the population locked so no funny business that could result in things like unplanned pregnancies, but the world would be a little fairer, long-term wearers get a well-earned break and long-term non-wearers a much-overdue lesson in delayed gratification.

                                youdontknowme No. Chastityty belts have to be orderet for both. Otherwise it will be REALY unfair.

                                  youdontknowme

                                  if we lived in this kind of world, i would agree with @Kaja, then both genders should have to wear a belt and the "outober" should apply to everyone 😉

                                      Angelina Obviously establishing some more gender equality should be the long-term goal, but I doubt that would be easy to achieve in a world where the rules, customs and traditions were as one-sided as that. And I reckon the only way to convince the people who came up with the idea of locking girls up in the first place would be to have different free months for boys and for girls.

                                      Who knows, you might even get 6 free months out of it in the end.

                                          youdontknowme

                                          i would agree if there were different months, then at least there would be no illicit sex, but i think the months should be evenly distributed. however, i also admit that it would probably find less acceptance this way (especially with men).

                                          • Joh replied to this.

                                              Angelina i also admit that it would probably find less acceptance this way (especially with men).

                                              I also see less acceptance with the female majority.

                                                  Joh I also see less acceptance with the female majority.

                                                  that's why it would be fairer if men had to wear it too, then women wouldn't feel disadvantaged. to be clear we are of course only talking about theoretical mind games 😉

                                                  • Joh replied to this.

                                                      Angelina I don't see any mayor unbalance between male and female wearing a CB. Count how many members are male and female with belt we have.

                                                          Joh I don't see any mayor unbalance between male and female wearing a CB. Count how many members are male and female with belt we have.

                                                          The interesting question would be how many "forced" or "convinced" wearers we have compared by wearers who truly want/love to wear it, splitted by gender.

                                                          I am not sure, but I have the feeling that more man wear it because they want it and more girls have to wear it because someone else wants it.

                                                              Sara2001 more man wear it because they want it and more girls have to wear it because someone else wants it.

                                                              This.

                                                              And the mere fact that this is a shared perception of reality is (of course unaccurate) interesting.